Steve Breen for October 16, 2019

  1. Avatar
    JDave   over 4 years ago

    Supporting freedom would cost Lebron a small part of his income. He can’t afford it. /s

     •  Reply
  2. Tj
    • Thomas  over 4 years ago

    Every other U.S. Fortune 500 corporation has taken a bold stand against China for democracy’s sake, foregoing imports, trillions in profit$, and an incredibly cheap manufacturing base.

    Hong Kong, Yemen, North Korea, Kurdistan, Ukraine, and all those other s#!thole countries just know that President Trump will not let democracy die out.

    Indeed, except for the evil NBA [owned & directed by the players, who are mostly black], all of corporate America has united under the leadership of our president and the Republicans — unmatched in wisdom — supporting freedom throughout the world.

     •  Reply
  3. E43f09f0 d9ab 4f55 b739 d75d4df15e24
    quixotic3  over 4 years ago

    Here’s a list of companies who have genuflected to China: https://github.com/caffeine-overload/bandinchina It would be helpful if we had some leadership in the White House that supported democratic movements instead of authoritarian ones.

     •  Reply
  4. Front sword at ready
    shamest Premium Member over 4 years ago

    I stand with Hong Kong

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    Display  over 4 years ago

    Lives or nothin’ but net profits? Hmm… Last I heard Xi & Co. had about 10% of NBA in their very deep pockets (sponsorship and other investments). Now we know what the price of souls is. And yet people continue to give Colin Kaepernick crap for using his right of free speech – agree with his thoughts or not it’s still his right to express them and at least he stands up for his right to express them. Where are the voices of the NBA? How willing are other rich athletes to sell others and even their own right to free speech down the river? Would they stand up for anyone not handing the league a paycheck? Did all the balls in the NBA get caught in the net?

     •  Reply
  6. Download
    Walter Kocker Premium Member over 4 years ago

    Oooo, an athlete.

    (yawn)

     •  Reply
  7. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 4 years ago

    Use of tear gas in warfare (as with all other chemical weapons,) is prohibited by various international treaties that most states have signed. Police and private self-defense use is not banned in the same manner.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Steve Breen