I could care less if they marry, but their divorces are going to cost me tax money for more courts and judges. I say keep the government out of ALL marriage. Nothing about regulating or charging a fee for marriage in the constitution. Let churches regulate marriages and divorces, and create your own gay church if necessary. The Church of the Iron Codpiece or something. For those who are not religiously inclined, create the First Non-Church of Nothing or use civil union contracts and make the happy newlyweds pay for their own “divorces” when it all goes into the crapper. Too much government. P-tooey!
Ah, blessed simplicity; so easy to bury your mind in a mythical, simpler time rather than to really attempt to understand the complicatedcdynamics which got you to where you are. Privilege does have a rankness about it.
WHAT THE HECK, I 100% DISAGREE WITH THE LAST SLIDE!!!!!THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU NEED TO DO!!!!! I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE THINKING THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE BACK TO NORMAL WITHOUT GAYS! WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THAT HELP. GAYS ARE PEOPLE NOT ANIMALS SO STOP TREATING THEM LIKE THEY ARE!!! GAYS HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS US, SO….STOP. ITS NOT COOL AND IT HURTS OTHERS THAT ARE GAY SO BACK OFF!!!!!!
HOLY FRICKIN GOD!!!! WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YA’LL SAYING???? WHY YA’LL SAYING STUFF ABOUT TRANS GENDER PEOPLE!!! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU!!!! THEY ARE PEOPLE WITH RIGHTS AND THEY ARE THE SAME RIGHTS YA’LL HAVE. SO IF YA’LL ARE GOING TO JUDGE PEOPLE BY WHO THEY ARE, JUDGE YOUR FRICKIN SELF, BECAUSE PEOPLE THAT SAY STUFF LIKE THAT NEED TO REALIZE THAT THE WAY THEY JUDGE PEOPLE IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG
hawgowar over 5 years ago
I could care less if they marry, but their divorces are going to cost me tax money for more courts and judges. I say keep the government out of ALL marriage. Nothing about regulating or charging a fee for marriage in the constitution. Let churches regulate marriages and divorces, and create your own gay church if necessary. The Church of the Iron Codpiece or something. For those who are not religiously inclined, create the First Non-Church of Nothing or use civil union contracts and make the happy newlyweds pay for their own “divorces” when it all goes into the crapper. Too much government. P-tooey!
Ida No over 5 years ago
Well, with transgendered people no longer existing by definition, we should be seeing a properity bump any second now…
ArtyD2 Premium Member over 5 years ago
Best history class ever. Pootypoo has doubled down on the gay thing. Still goes around shirtless. just sayin
PoodleGroomer over 5 years ago
Son’t forget mining of critical metals to build the next generation of technology. Most of those inexhaustible mines are empty holes now.
gary.eddings4157 Premium Member over 5 years ago
Ah, blessed simplicity; so easy to bury your mind in a mythical, simpler time rather than to really attempt to understand the complicatedcdynamics which got you to where you are. Privilege does have a rankness about it.
johngregor Premium Member over 5 years ago
Nice try but, except for a few minor blimps, America was prosperous for 324 years before WWII and for exactly 26 years after.
11(srangerthings) over 5 years ago
WHAT THE HECK, I 100% DISAGREE WITH THE LAST SLIDE!!!!!THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU NEED TO DO!!!!! I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE THINKING THAT EVERYTHING WILL BE BACK TO NORMAL WITHOUT GAYS! WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THAT HELP. GAYS ARE PEOPLE NOT ANIMALS SO STOP TREATING THEM LIKE THEY ARE!!! GAYS HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS US, SO….STOP. ITS NOT COOL AND IT HURTS OTHERS THAT ARE GAY SO BACK OFF!!!!!!
11(srangerthings) over 5 years ago
HOLY FRICKIN GOD!!!! WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE YA’LL SAYING???? WHY YA’LL SAYING STUFF ABOUT TRANS GENDER PEOPLE!!! WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU!!!! THEY ARE PEOPLE WITH RIGHTS AND THEY ARE THE SAME RIGHTS YA’LL HAVE. SO IF YA’LL ARE GOING TO JUDGE PEOPLE BY WHO THEY ARE, JUDGE YOUR FRICKIN SELF, BECAUSE PEOPLE THAT SAY STUFF LIKE THAT NEED TO REALIZE THAT THE WAY THEY JUDGE PEOPLE IS ABSOLUTELY WRONG
Spock over 5 years ago
Great strip!
unclejackmoore over 5 years ago
Wow. And not one comment about the revisionist history. No wonder.