First Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau for October 26, 1970

  1. Sm star k
    Unkatee Premium Member over 15 years ago

    the first published strip included 3-way parallelism as the set-up

     •  Reply
  2. Missing large
    DOBRIEN  over 15 years ago

    how do you search the archive

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    polyglotinc  about 15 years ago

    yes, how do you search? (like the ad promised before I signed up)

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    vikcarty  almost 15 years ago

    how do you search the archive?

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    KRORRORR  over 14 years ago

    the beginning of a beautiful relationship

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    trncobrien Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Following are character tags added to Doonesbury strips from the beginning to

    1 / 22 / 72

    and 7 / 1 / 07 - 8 / 3 / 08

    and 9 / 21 / 08

    and 9 / 28 / 08

    and 11 / 16 / 08

    and 11 / 24 / 08 - 11 / 30 /08

    and 1 / 19 / 09 – 1 / 24 / 09

    and 9 / 28 / 09 - 4 / 1 / 11

    excluding unposted / nonexistent Sunday strips ( Sundays before 3/21/71 and 4/18-6/6/71). I usually put character and other tags with the subject’s first appearance in a story or “theme week” ; for other related strips check the strips preceding and following the tagged ones.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    trncobrien Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Reserved for future use

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    trncobrien Premium Member over 14 years ago

    Reserved for future use

     •  Reply
  9. Calvin1
    Starrman69  over 13 years ago

    The first strip…my sophomore year of college 1970..Heavy Sigh….reminds me so much of my roommate…… Thanks for the memories

     •  Reply
  10. 1899lsu avatar
    YatInExile  over 13 years ago

    Is this a rerun?

    ;-)

     •  Reply
  11. Comunismo thumb5756560
    Ceciliasa  about 13 years ago

    =)

     •  Reply
  12. Psn logo free.square triangle ex o
    DylanThomas3.14159  over 12 years ago

    Great!

     •  Reply
  13. Avatar2 frog
    GTphile  over 12 years ago

    So pleased to offer my immense appreciation.

     •  Reply
  14. Large opopopopopop
    xall2h1  about 12 years ago

    That football guy’s a jerk

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    John Willis Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    I had forgotten how crudely drawn the early years were. Yet they were some of his best work. Liberal yet still funny. Last 10 years it’s been liberal but NOT funny.

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    explorser  over 10 years ago

    WOW, amazing to see how the strip began… so crude the drawings, so farce the humor. Amazing how it all begins liberal, stays liberal, but gets less funny but more artistic.

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    explorser  over 10 years ago

    wha… what the heck are you saying, and how long did it take you to type all that?

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    DeltaMikeUno  about 10 years ago

    Add to Minor Named Characters:Mister ButtsMister JayRon Headrest

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    KnifeSmile  about 9 years ago

    Mike really changed a lot in looks and concept from these early strips to later on…

     •  Reply
  20. Snoopy
    Darryl Heine  over 8 years ago

    The strip that started in all in October 1970, then rerun in March 2014 when classic daily strip rerun mode started mixed in with first run Sunday Doonesbury strips.

     •  Reply
  21. Image
    Jaydowg  almost 8 years ago

    Doonesbury is being sarcastic!

     •  Reply
  22. Jg whitesox
    John Glynn creator over 7 years ago

    I like butterscotch

     •  Reply
  23. Img 0712
    Proud to be a Geek  about 7 years ago

    Doonesbury looks so different from now. My favorite character is mike

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    learninglair1  over 6 years ago

    mca: major character appearence

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    learninglair1  over 6 years ago

    mca: b.d., mike

     •  Reply
  26. Chief wahoo
    aerotica69  almost 6 years ago

    In 1979 there were still bugs in the roommate assignment program.

     •  Reply
  27. Selfie may 11  2017
    MAGNUM05  almost 6 years ago

    Nothing beats a blast from the past

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    Caretaker24523  almost 4 years ago

    I’m 15 days older than this strip… yikes!

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    minecraftchamp33  over 3 years ago

    And so it begins…

     •  Reply
  30. Missing large
    trncobrien Premium Member almost 3 years ago

    The missing Sunday strips from 1971 have been found,you can see them here: http://www.dailycartoonist.com/index.php/2021/07/18/the-missing-doonesbury-sundays-no-longer-lost/

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    Susan00100  about 2 years ago

    Whatever that paper does, I just hope they DON’T hire Steve Benson!!!

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    Susan00100  about 2 years ago

    Mike and Kim have been married 30 years.

    Much longer than many real-life couples.

     •  Reply
  33. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  9 months ago

    -

    This moron actually wrote the following about the Civil Rights movement:

    Just half a decade into the civil rights revolution, America had something it had never had at the federal level, something the overwhelming majority of its citizens would never have approved: an explicit system of racial preference. Plainly the civil rights acts had wrought a change in the country’s constitutional culture.__

    _

     •  Reply
  34. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  2 months ago

    -

    “When [Senator Joseph R.]McCarthy started, I expected to be a target simply because I was involved in things he was throwing rocks at,” he said. "I never was a target.

    Now, looking back, I suspect my Irish name, my being a Catholic and an ex-marine sort of softened the blow."

    -

     •  Reply
  35. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY  about 1 month ago

    -

    The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

    _

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Doonesbury