Ripley's Believe It or Not by Ripley’s Believe It or Not! for March 25, 2014

  1. B986e866 14d0 4607 bdb4 5d76d7b56ddb
    Templo S.U.D.  about 10 years ago

    You sure hear of the oddest fauna in the world.

     •  Reply
  2. Image gl2xu6o8 1679017467894 raw
    Space_cat  about 10 years ago

    I I remember correctly Scapa Flow isn’t all that deep and the British salvaged the wrecks anyway.

     •  Reply
  3. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  about 10 years ago

    Congrats to Michael Wardian for running two races in one day and winning one of them. But which one?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    Blakdanielle  about 10 years ago

    What Gmartin says is basically true. It is also true for the ruling family of Russia at the time. Czar Nicolas and King George V were cousins but looked like brothers.

    However none of these points have actually anything to do with why the German navy was confined to Scapa Flow. The truth is that the Germans had been already defeated at sea, and the navy was impounded by the British. The negotiations dragged on to wind up the war and the German admiral got antsy and ordered the fleet scuttled. German seaman had spent the nine months preparing the ships to go under so it went fairly smoothly.

    Even so the Brits saved about 12 ships right off the bat and over the years pulled many out for scrap metal.

     •  Reply
  5. 10 years later takeshi yamamoto
    Tha_Hype  about 10 years ago

    All these people that run multiple marathons puts the first marathoner at a distinct disadvantage. Makes his feat seem a lot less impressive. Being the first is tough. Marathons used to be considered tough. More and more people are doing them with no ill effects. (I’m NOT one of them). Its unfortunate that the first to complete it didn’t survive afterwards.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    tuslog64  about 10 years ago

    Re the armoured rat:How does he hold up against at 7.50 X15 ?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    Stephen Gilberg  about 10 years ago

    Now that’s what I call a runner’s high.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    Phil721  about 10 years ago

    Back in the day when tire section width was measured in inches there was a 7.10 x15 and 7.60 x15 but no 7.50 × 15 (also 6.70, 7.75, 8.20, 8.45 and 9.00)

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    former Quebecer  about 10 years ago

    I don’t believe this. I would have trouble CYCLING 42 km, let alone walking or running it. Twice in a day? Sorry,I don’t buy it.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Ripley's Believe It or Not