Advertisement

Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for January 28, 2013

  1. Missing large
    tuna1  over 8 years ago

    Isn’t it already an impediment?

     •  Reply
  2. Croparcs070707
    rayannina  over 8 years ago

    It can be – just ask Orwell.

     •  Reply
  3. Cutiger
    rentier  over 8 years ago

    Many politician do so and confuse it, so you can understand nothing any more!!

     •  Reply
  4. Clouseau
    el8  over 8 years ago

    “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.” – Hunter S. Thompson.

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    january28711  over 8 years ago

    Impact. Contact. Perfectly good nouns that have been verbed. sigh

     •  Reply
  6. Old joe
    ratlum  over 8 years ago

    O Hobbes thats been around for a long time already .

     •  Reply
  7. Img 0045a
    jai-jai  over 8 years ago

    Google :)

     •  Reply
  8. Minime 100x100
    Linux0s  over 8 years ago

    Totally photoshopped.

     •  Reply
  9. But eo
    Rakkav  over 8 years ago

    Actually, language degenerates at least as much as it develops. The problem for most people seems to be telling which is which.

     •  Reply
  10. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  over 8 years ago

    It always has been, Hobbes. I think it was Voltaire who said language helps us conceal out thoughts.

     •  Reply
  11. A service i need
    Kvasir42 Premium Member over 8 years ago

    There are a few sports announcers who do this.

     •  Reply
  12. Stormdrainnodump
    pelican47  over 8 years ago

    Disposition. As in how do we disposition product when it comes in for repair.

     •  Reply
  13. Calvin and hobbes wallpaper by leyne
    Phapada  over 8 years ago

    some time am confusing in englishhhhhhhhh…………..

     •  Reply
  14. Photo  1
    thirdguy  over 8 years ago

    I’d say this was a good read,but that would be way too obvious.

     •  Reply
  15. Av 5363
    prasrinivara  over 8 years ago

    Eventually? It already was even long before this strip — for example, Americans could not (and many still cannot) understand “bin it” (which is very obvious in Britain).

     •  Reply
  16. 705px china xinjiang.svg
    arye uygur  over 8 years ago

    If Ms Wormwood could overhear Calvin’s conversation she would promote him to head of the the class.

     •  Reply
  17. Queru 2
    lisapaloma13  over 8 years ago

    Ditto. Who wants to go back to noun cases and elaborate conjugations? If Anglo-Saxon hadn’t been used badly by the masses, we’d still be speaking it. Or Proto-IndoEuropean. Or whatever preceded it.

     •  Reply
  18. Sushi
    annafrances  over 8 years ago

    my bad!. lol totally rad strip wtfhowzat?

     •  Reply
  19. Missing large
    Ensoh  over 8 years ago

    So I’m like, “yeah!”

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Pithy (yeah, right)  over 8 years ago

    @Elizabeth Justice:

    Actually, according to Dictionary.com, the word “impact”, as both a noun and a verb, entered the English language in 1775-85 as a back-formation from “impacted” (with reference to teeth), which came into the language c. 1600 from the Latin impactus (with the meaning “press closely into something”).

    According to the same source, “contact” did enter the language (in the 1620s) as a noun, but has been in use as a verb since 1834.

     •  Reply
  21. Hobbes
    Hobbes Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Now we can Google everything. As the language progresses, soon we will be able to Ebay things. Sometimes I like to Calvin my imagination.

     •  Reply
  22. Hobbes
    Hobbes Premium Member over 8 years ago

    Click here: Peanuts (December 26, 1977)Click here: Pearls Before Swine (October 15, 2003)Click here: Peanuts (September 2, 1969)

     •  Reply
  23. Hobbes
    Hobbes Premium Member over 8 years ago

    And, finally, here is one for Puddleglum:Click here: Non Sequitur (October 6, 2011)

     •  Reply
  24. Missing large
    ajnotales  over 8 years ago

    I’ll have to google the origins of this … :-)

     •  Reply
  25. Missing large
    mkd_1218  over 8 years ago

    Almost there, Hobbes!

     •  Reply
  26. Picture 001
    rshive  over 8 years ago

    Seems like we’ve already got a good start, Hobbes.

     •  Reply
  27. Missing large
    germanvisitor  over 8 years ago

    Just when you thought it is the politicians’ mission to make language harder to understand.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    Chris Kenworthy  over 8 years ago

    I don’t remember when access wasn’t both a noun and a verb… and I don’t think Calvin does either – but Bill probably does. According to etymonline.com, the verb usage in computing dates to 1962

     •  Reply
  29. Missing large
    William Timm  over 8 years ago

    I hate it when people ask me if I went golfing.

     •  Reply
  30. Calvin and hobbes in the future
    Thomas Linquist  over 8 years ago

    And people wonder why contracts have to be so oddly phrased and state the obvious seven or eight times. If you leave some people the tiniest bit of ambiguity of language, they will use it.

     •  Reply
  31. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  over 8 years ago

    Americans have been “canning” vegetables for over 60 years. And yet they use jars.

     •  Reply
  32. Hobbes
    Hobbes Premium Member over 8 years ago

    @orinoco womble: That’s really a jarring observation.

     •  Reply
  33. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  over 8 years ago

    How fun!

     •  Reply
  34. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member over 8 years ago

    We take verbs and use them as nouns quite regularly, as gerunds, so why not the opposite? Or don’t you like my nitpicking?

     •  Reply
  35. Imagescaqn0688
    Akuinnen  over 8 years ago

    sigh What an odd conundrum that I have stumbled upon. Does Calvin mean that he can and will take any noun and transform it into a verb? Or does he mean that he can take virtually and word and make it a verb? Hmmmm……..

     •  Reply
  36. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  over 8 years ago

    @orinoco womble,Can you can it, please? :o)

     •  Reply
  37. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  over 8 years ago

    @Hobbes,And he goes, “Birds of a feather flock together.”If the grammar police throw him into jail, he’ll be another kind of bird.I had never heard of a bird being prepositioned, before.

     •  Reply
  38. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  over 8 years ago

    @LX013 (from yesterday),It doesn’t mean that it’s sinful for a husband and wife to do what is necessary to conceive a child. It means that we inherit the sinful nature (originally from Adam through the fall). We inherit inclinations and tendencies to sin from previous generations.“The sins of the fathers are visited upon the children unto the third and fourth generation.” Because the children take after their parents through these inherited traits, they sin in the same or similar ways as their parents and suffer the consequences of their sinful deeds, actions, and thoughts.Thank you for inquiring. I hope I have clarified it.

     •  Reply
  39. Missing large
    52james  over 8 years ago

    Gift me! I’m impacted!

     •  Reply
  40. Jack benny 02
    Kali39  over 8 years ago

    Why we’ll never have a world language: .. Polish has no vowels.. Hawaiian has no consonents.. English has no sense.…And German sounds like an insult when you say hello.…A long time ago, I saw a sign at a Polish restaurant that said that Polish is easy…once you realize that “pstrang” is pronounced like “honk.”

     •  Reply
  41. Img 6807  2
    JanCinLV  over 8 years ago

    So it was Calvin that made disrespect into a verb!

     •  Reply
  42. Imgp1631
    pedalflower  over 8 years ago

    gifting is a favorite of mine. or should I say, I’ve favorited gifting for teeth gnashing.

     •  Reply
  43. Imgres
    calvinsfriend110  over 8 years ago

    At least he shows interest in grammar.

     •  Reply
  44. Willy wonka factory
    dsom8  over 8 years ago

    I wonder if Watterson, when he drew this rant, considered that what he was doing at that moment was “cartooning.” The language allows this crossover and is full of examples. The only “weirding” that happens is when a new occurrence enters the vocabulary and has an unfamiliar ring to it. It may sound jarring, especially to the purists, but there is no grammatical rule being violated!

     •  Reply
  45. Crazybikebns 468x352
    bigsnooze  over 8 years ago

    In the beginning there was the word

     •  Reply
  46. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  over 8 years ago

    @Night-Gaunt49,Everyone who has ever been born would have done what Adam and Eve did, so there would be no “innocent generations”, and forgiveness would still be necessary.

     •  Reply
  47. Snoopy   woodstock  hug
    Gretchen's Mom  over 8 years ago

    Hobbes was more prophetic than he knew way back in 1993 . . . language just about has been made “a complete impediment to understanding” (at least, for some of us anyhow!) — it’s called texting.

     •  Reply
  48. Popeyesforearm image
    Popeyesforearm  over 8 years ago

    the government has been doing it for years on every document the print.

     •  Reply
  49. Missing large
    khpage  over 8 years ago

    This ’toon gave me a good laugh – much needed these days…

     •  Reply
  50. Missing large
    bizaker  over 8 years ago

    A wise friend once told me: “Milk! It’s both a noun and a verb! You get what you do!”

     •  Reply
  51. Missing large
    ambassadorstt  over 8 years ago

    ……" it was so fun……" ?

     •  Reply
  52. Missing large
    lindacj Premium Member over 8 years ago

    disrespected!

     •  Reply
  53. Yellow pig small
    bmonk  over 8 years ago

    I quoted this just the other day! I agree: Verbing weirds language.

     •  Reply
  54. Missing large
    sfb5761  over 8 years ago

    For those of us old enough to remember when party, parent, and text were nouns.

     •  Reply
  55. Steve3a
    JP Steve Premium Member over 8 years ago

    ‘but canning started under Napoleon Bonaparte. They were called “tins.”’

    Yet when Appert invented canning he used bottles!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Appert

     •  Reply
  56. Avatar hoover 2009 10 29
    Richard V Anderson  over 8 years ago

    Ah yes, almost my all-time favorite C&H cartoon. I howled when it first came out oh so many years ago.

     •  Reply
  57. Jack benny 02
    Kali39  over 8 years ago

    If you imagine Colonel Klink saying it, yes…

     •  Reply
  58. Creeperface1
    jonas.bahn  over 8 years ago

    why are there just reruns on Calvin and Hobbes? As much as I like it, it should have fresh comics, like Garfield.

     •  Reply
  59. Missing large
    38lowell  over 8 years ago

    Many HS kids think a language is an impediment to understanding, like English!

     •  Reply
  60. Srt viper blue 2
    rgcviper  over 8 years ago

    As I once saw on Facebook …

    “I am not disturbed, or even perturbed, that you observed your love of ‘blurb’ as a verb.”

    Classic.

     •  Reply
  61. Willin 2
    bluskies  over 8 years ago

    Can if he has a bigger can to can it in!

     •  Reply
  62. 1 22 06
    SusanCraig  over 8 years ago

    what I find amazing about communication is the illusion that it actually happens!

     •  Reply
  63. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  over 8 years ago

    @Night-Gaunt49,Humans don’t always react the same way, but they all sin (and I think they all would have done what Adam and Eve did since that was the only thing prohibited at the time), so all need forgiveness through Jesus Christ who is the only one who never sinned, but willingly suffered the penalty for our sins.Occam’s razor – “The simplest answer is often correct.”Simple people often try to correct what isn’t wrong to suit their own fancies.

     •  Reply
  64. Missing large
    0ldreamer  over 8 years ago

    Why talk at all if you don’t want to be understood?

     •  Reply
  65. Missing large
    0ldreamer  over 8 years ago

    Everybody misunderstood the political slogan, “CHANGE”. See what an impediment language can be.

     •  Reply
  66. Large henry
    ---  about 4 years ago

    Wow 80 comments

     •  Reply
  67. 20170924 220103
    Romeo2Delta2  almost 2 years ago

    “Eventually, we will have restructured the language so that thought crime becomes impossible.” —George Orwell

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Calvin and Hobbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement