Advertisement

Calvin and Hobbes by Bill Watterson for September 17, 2012

44 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1. Img 0910
    BE THIS GUY Premium Member about 7 years ago

    Hobbes loves looking at the fourth wall.

     •  Reply
  2. Cutiger
    rentier  about 7 years ago

    No tail! That’s impossible!

     •  Reply
  3. Emerald
    margueritem  about 7 years ago

    I see Hobbes point.

     •  Reply
  4. Nebulous100
    Nebulous Premium Member about 7 years ago

    And then there are all the females who think that they should have had a tail and get a “Tail Removal Scar” tattooed on.

     •  Reply
  5. Image
    John Davis  about 7 years ago

    The tale of this story is that there isn’t one.

     •  Reply
  6. Avatar tmp 56884 thumb
    orinoco womble  about 7 years ago

    Thereby hangs a tale…no tail.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    38lowell  about 7 years ago

    So, are we gonna go back to being four-legged and have a tail?No tail on Calvin. No pants on Hobbes.

     •  Reply
  8. Samvadi fb
    in.amongst  about 7 years ago

    Aaah – the sting is in the tail…

     •  Reply
  9. Calvin and hobbes wallpaper by leyne
    Phapada  about 7 years ago

    have a big Hole ha ha haaa

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Brockie  about 7 years ago

    Tail is on the flip side you dope.

     •  Reply
  11. Ipod pics 009
    Karaboo2  about 7 years ago

    Don’t worry Calvin, there isn’t no room in your jeans for a tail. Haha

     •  Reply
  12. Wls 1
    Aaberon  about 7 years ago

    HA!! I want your desk next to my desk at the office – just so they’d have to break us up and make us sit elsewhere.

     •  Reply
  13. Grog   droob color
    GROG Premium Member about 7 years ago

    I think his big mouth more than makes up for the lack of a tail, Hobbes.

     •  Reply
  14. Snoopyhockey
    cdward  about 7 years ago

    One more appendage would just get him into that much more trouble.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    MagicFan  about 7 years ago

    As a matter of fact, Calvin, you narcissist, you are not.

     •  Reply
  16. Packrat
    Packratjohn Premium Member about 7 years ago

    If we had to choose an animal’s tail to be permanently attached to us, which one would you choose?

     •  Reply
  17. Cimg1807
    cookies333  about 7 years ago

    No claws either.

     •  Reply
  18. Missing large
    Hoodude  about 7 years ago

    Evolution:no dice

     •  Reply
  19. Pikachu
    Number Three  about 7 years ago

    Ooooooh! Hobbes, Bad Boy!

    xxx

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  about 7 years ago

    “I am the culmination of creation.”Ali thought he was the ‘crown’ of creation. He said, “I am the King of the World.”

     •  Reply
  21. Coffee turtle avatar
    coffeeturtle  about 7 years ago

    My mom would tell you exactly what your butt needed!!!

     •  Reply
  22. Old joe
    ratlum  about 7 years ago

    Hobbes is right,just think how handy a tail would be to hold on to tools your going to use,little kids while your on the phone.Thats just 2things.But I can see a great future for a well trained tail.Calvin would love it for snow ball fights.

     •  Reply
  23. Missing large
    khpage  about 7 years ago

    The enhancements are in the eye of the beholder of the pants…

     •  Reply
  24. Imgres
    calvinsfriend110  about 7 years ago

    The tail of a young boy.

     •  Reply
  25. Popeyesforearm image
    Popeyesforearm  about 7 years ago

    Listening to the “Airplane” on the way to work this morning ’Crown of Creation". Very ironic that this toon showed up today too. “Life is change, how it differs from a rock”.

     •  Reply
  26. Frinkmeep
    Clobbered by Science Premium Member about 7 years ago

    @Nabuquduriuzhur

    1. Citation please. Author and title.

    2. There’s no such thing as “devolving.” Natural selection doesn’t care if, for example we swim, slither, crawl, walk on four legs, walk on two legs with our knuckles scraping the ground, or walk on two legs with arms too short to touch the ground. Natural selection cares whether the way we get around enables us to survive and reproduce in our current environment. Going from two-leg walking back to swimming isn’t “devolving.” It’s just “evolving.”

    3. The only known beneficial “genetic error” is sickle cell? Snort. In the recessive condition, SC protects against malaria, just like you said. But in the recessive condition, Tay-Sachs may help protect against TB (that one’s still not decided yet though). And in the recessive condition, cystic fibrosis is protective against cholera, typhoid fever, and possibly asthma. In the dominant condition, these conditions are disabling, quickly and horribly fatal, and disabling and life-shortening, respectively. There is also a “genetic error” in the gene that produces CCR5, a protein receptor on the surface of white blood cells. People homozygous for this “error” seem to have a greater susceptibility to West Nile Virus, but they are completely immune to many strains of HIV.

    4. And about those “genetic errors.” (By which I assume you mean DNA transcription errors that happen during the formation of the reproductive cells and thence are passed to the next generation – the ONLY kind of errors that have any relevance whatsoever to evolution.) Well, “genetic errors” of all sorts happen all the time. Some are harmful. Most have no effect. A few are beneficial to continued survival, or greater reproduction, or both. An individual with a beneficial “error” will tend to leave more offspring, and if the “error” is transmissible to the next generation, some or all of the offspring will also have the “error.” If this cycle continues through the generations, eventually the beneficial “error” will become more prevalent in the population. Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you Evolution by Natural Selection. Give ‘er a round of applause.

    5. Perhaps your point was that we’re all “devolving” into sicker, more pathetic versions of ourselves, and eventually at some point it might even get so bad that some future generation will dissolve into a puddle of inert goo because, darn it, our genes got too riddled with errors. If that’s ever happened in 3.5-ish billion years of evolution on this planet, I’d love to hear about it. Generally, extinction happens because environmental factors change, and the mechanisms of natural selection don’t have time to produce new forms or behaviors that can survive in the new environment. They certainly die trying though. Extinction does not happen because one’s own genome implodes from within and self-destructs the species. If humans became the first, it’d certainly be an interesting process to observe.

    6. Try the Bill Nye the Science Guy episode on evolution. I’m not being sarcastic. It’s a pretty good introduction to the subject.

    @Everyone else – pardon my rambling.

     •  Reply
  27. Frinkmeep
    Clobbered by Science Premium Member about 7 years ago

    tl;dr:

    Nabs, evolution doesn’t happen that way. I highly doubt a reputable scientist would write a book like the one you describe. Either the scientist wasn’t a good one, or you completely misinterpreted what he wrote.

     •  Reply
  28. Missing large
    login88 Premium Member about 7 years ago

    @Nabuquduriuzhur: One person’s mutation is another’s evolution =)

     •  Reply
  29. Hereslookingatyou
    DryCreekGeezer  about 7 years ago

    Dr. Sheldon Cooper, thy middle name is Calvin.

     •  Reply
  30. Masked
    Rickapolis  about 7 years ago

    I see a wedgie coming.

     •  Reply
  31. Missing large
    Puddleglum2  about 7 years ago

    “The fool has said in his heart; there is no God.”

     •  Reply
  32. Missing large
    lillypadspie  about 7 years ago

    haha

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Calvin and Hobbes

Advertisement