Tom Toles by Tom Toles

Tom Toles

Comments (38) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    You might want to wait until you see how this attack on Syria by Israel plays out. Could be curtains for us all.

  2. capndunzzl

    capndunzzl said, over 2 years ago

    …send all the NRA supporters.

  3. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 2 years ago

    @capndunzzl

    No, send the liberals as meat shields.

  4. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, over 2 years ago

    For once Obummer should use the conservative tactic of forcefully, self-righteously and aggressively doing nothing.

  5. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 2 years ago

    @capndunzzl

    http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/02/free-nra-membership-for-active-duty-military-personnel/

    And while you are condemning one Lobbyist, don’t forget to include some of these. I’m sure you can find a few that you can blame for killing children (try planned parenthood first)

    http://lobbydata.com/Directory

  6. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 2 years ago

    ^planned parenthood places infants for adoption. that is hardly killing children.

  7. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 2 years ago

    @ghostkeeper. I like that idea.

  8. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 2 years ago

    TheTrustedMechanic said, 25 minutes ago

    “@capndunzzl

    Well they should be self-equipped so less taxpayer money would be required. But that can’t happen, then what would all the warmongers waste our money “buying?” After all the reason the Rs love war is because it’s an excuse to give their wealthy friends even more taxpayer money."

    you’re leaving out the obvious. the reason we arm both sides, is so that we have to develop new and better weapons to keep to ourselves. until we sell them to both sides and the cycle starts again.

    one of the problems with that though is the last few generations of weapons get used against us (but they’re volunteers or draftees, so it doesn’t matter) and the fact of the matter is those old weapons are quite lethal.

  9. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, over 2 years ago

    “Sure, we can draft everyone on wellfare and all the muslims to go fight, and then not bring them back home.”


    Why do you have such disdain for the poor, disabled, and the elderly? What did they ever do to you?

  10. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 2 years ago

    It’s unfortunate that the US can only open one door first, and not all three simultaneously. The New York Times has an Op-ed by a senior editor today that the US MUST go to war, and go quickly.


    And that’s absolutely right. Wilson said the US would not go to war, and the Kaiser then took liberties forcing Wilson to declare war and send US troops to Europe. Then FDR said the US would not go to war, and the Japs attacked and Hitler declared war on the US.


    After WWII, the US learned its lesson, and quickly went into Korea, then Vietnam, and then Grenada. Had we refrained, every America would now be queuing for kleb and borscht and there would only be one brand of toothpaste.


    After that, the US was attacked by Panamá, but Bush, Sr responded forcefully, or we’d be queuing for ceviche (for those who don’t know, that’s raw fish and hot pepper, something no decent American would ever want to eat).


    Both Bushes took the war to Iraq, or we’d be queuing for goat and every male American would be forced to go to the mosque five times every day.


    Now, of course, Obama promised that chemical weapons would be a game changer. The UK government says it is irrefutable that chemical weapons have been used, so the US must respond with overwhelming force while the UK provides that essential cheering section so necessary to victory.


    But the UK has one Commie newspaper, the Manchester Guardian, which had one article on 27 April that Bashar had not used chemical weapons, and another such article today.


    Fortunately, every single major US newspaper agrees with official US government releases that Bashar has irrefutably used chemical weapons, so the US MUST take some sort of military action. And the more military action and the more profits for defence contractors the better!

  11. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, over 2 years ago

    You mean like yourself?

  12. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 2 years ago

    Newest report from Reuters. While it may or may not be the final word on this issue, it does show why ANY leader should take time to make sure of the facts before taking military action.
    ^
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE94409Z20130505
    ^
    For over a year, I’ve supported an internationally backed no fly zone and a safe zone near the Turkish border and still do, however, if the report from Reuters is true, the red line was not crossed by Assad and we definitely do not want to give weapons to rebels who would use sarin gas on civilians.
    Respecfully,
    C.

  13. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Thank you for showing the hate you have to us. You prejudices. The Nazis would like you to formally join them. You already have the right mind set for them, the murder instinct.

  14. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    So you dare to say that Conservatives didn’t back any of the wars of the past 60 years? You sure can make up a fake history to follow. Keeps your head on crooked so that you can make even more unsubstantiated statements.

  15. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    It was Liberals who were against all those wars not Conservatives.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (23).
Calvin and Hobbes 30th Anniversary