Tom Toles by Tom Toles

Tom Toles

Comments (47) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    You might want to wait until you see how this attack on Syria by Israel plays out. Could be curtains for us all.

  2. capndunzzl

    capndunzzl said, about 1 year ago

    …send all the NRA supporters.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    No matter what the choice, we lose!

  4. rgwalther

    rgwalther GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @capndunzzl

    Send all the fake name trolls…

  5. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, about 1 year ago

    @capndunzzl

    No, send the liberals as meat shields.

  6. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, about 1 year ago

    For once Obummer should use the conservative tactic of forcefully, self-righteously and aggressively doing nothing.

  7. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @capndunzzl

    http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/2010/02/free-nra-membership-for-active-duty-military-personnel/

    And while you are condemning one Lobbyist, don’t forget to include some of these. I’m sure you can find a few that you can blame for killing children (try planned parenthood first)

    http://lobbydata.com/Directory

  8. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    ^planned parenthood places infants for adoption. that is hardly killing children.

  9. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    @ghostkeeper. I like that idea.

  10. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, about 1 year ago

    TheTrustedMechanic said, 25 minutes ago

    “@capndunzzl

    Well they should be self-equipped so less taxpayer money would be required. But that can’t happen, then what would all the warmongers waste our money “buying?” After all the reason the Rs love war is because it’s an excuse to give their wealthy friends even more taxpayer money."

    you’re leaving out the obvious. the reason we arm both sides, is so that we have to develop new and better weapons to keep to ourselves. until we sell them to both sides and the cycle starts again.

    one of the problems with that though is the last few generations of weapons get used against us (but they’re volunteers or draftees, so it doesn’t matter) and the fact of the matter is those old weapons are quite lethal.

  11. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release said, about 1 year ago

    “Sure, we can draft everyone on wellfare and all the muslims to go fight, and then not bring them back home.”


    Why do you have such disdain for the poor, disabled, and the elderly? What did they ever do to you?

  12. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, about 1 year ago

    It’s unfortunate that the US can only open one door first, and not all three simultaneously. The New York Times has an Op-ed by a senior editor today that the US MUST go to war, and go quickly.


    And that’s absolutely right. Wilson said the US would not go to war, and the Kaiser then took liberties forcing Wilson to declare war and send US troops to Europe. Then FDR said the US would not go to war, and the Japs attacked and Hitler declared war on the US.


    After WWII, the US learned its lesson, and quickly went into Korea, then Vietnam, and then Grenada. Had we refrained, every America would now be queuing for kleb and borscht and there would only be one brand of toothpaste.


    After that, the US was attacked by Panamá, but Bush, Sr responded forcefully, or we’d be queuing for ceviche (for those who don’t know, that’s raw fish and hot pepper, something no decent American would ever want to eat).


    Both Bushes took the war to Iraq, or we’d be queuing for goat and every male American would be forced to go to the mosque five times every day.


    Now, of course, Obama promised that chemical weapons would be a game changer. The UK government says it is irrefutable that chemical weapons have been used, so the US must respond with overwhelming force while the UK provides that essential cheering section so necessary to victory.


    But the UK has one Commie newspaper, the Manchester Guardian, which had one article on 27 April that Bashar had not used chemical weapons, and another such article today.


    Fortunately, every single major US newspaper agrees with official US government releases that Bashar has irrefutably used chemical weapons, so the US MUST take some sort of military action. And the more military action and the more profits for defence contractors the better!

  13. Michyle Glen

    Michyle Glen said, about 1 year ago

    Lets add a Fourth Curtain,,,,, USA

  14. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C and Martens Release said, about 1 year ago

    @rgwalther

    You mean like yourself?

  15. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, about 1 year ago

    Newest report from Reuters. While it may or may not be the final word on this issue, it does show why ANY leader should take time to make sure of the facts before taking military action.
    ^
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE94409Z20130505
    ^
    For over a year, I’ve supported an internationally backed no fly zone and a safe zone near the Turkish border and still do, however, if the report from Reuters is true, the red line was not crossed by Assad and we definitely do not want to give weapons to rebels who would use sarin gas on civilians.
    Respecfully,
    C.

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (32).