Matt Bors by Matt Bors

Matt Bors

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 1 year ago

    Looks about right…..

  2. Liam Burns

    Liam Burns GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Watermelon fruit juice, Skittles, and Robitussin – the Trayvon Martini – watch out, it’ll kill ya, after it destroys your liver and makes you so angry, paranoid, racist and homophobic that you try to play “The Knockdown Game” on a legally-armed stranger. The last bad choice in a life full of bad choices.

  3. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    According to Doctor Galvani, applying a polarizing current to the frog will result in an involuntary twitch response. According to Mister Edison, alternating the current will prove deadly and should be avoided at all costs. The voltage levels depicted here may be different from actual potentials these solar panels are able to produce in reality. It is necessary to connect them in series to achieve the voltage depicted by any one as a part of the battery of power cells. The actual difference, villainy to innocence, in any case is one third of that of the whole.

  4. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Traitor, Traitor, Thug want a be,
    Yawn grain of sand in the Ocean, To bad they save lives, Liberal dreamed up stereotype.

  5. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 1 year ago

    @Liam Burns

    Good summary of a theory used for Z-dog’s defense that can never be proven as the only other witness is dead.

  6. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago


    And it rests with the prosecution to prove their case. It’s how the “justice” system works. Do you want to convict people based on popular opinion as expressed in the media?

    The jury did it’s job properly.

    YOU, however, are using assumptions – which the “evidence” contradicts – to second guess the conclusions of a jury that sat and heard all the evidence, deliberated on it, asked for clarity on confusing issues and agreed on the proper verdict.

    I would say the same if the verdict was guilty. I didn’t sit on that jury.

  7. David B

    David B said, over 1 year ago

    @ossining… – Go read his tweets. Lean was a favorite of his. He tried to score some codeine, but it’s prescription, so it was recommended he buy Robitussin instead.
    Most of you deniers are too lazy to research how much of an “Angel” he wasn’t.

  8. zorko

    zorko GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    This is a case where events being observed write their own story. Very powerful.

  9. Vlad Taltos

    Vlad Taltos said, over 1 year ago

    Obama approves of two out of three.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago


    I can always count on you to see through the BS and present the truth. Thanks once again.

  11. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    A core NRA philosophy, well stated Neo!

  12. Stipple

    Stipple said, over 1 year ago

    A vivid snapshot of the current USA, tempted to get the framed copy I am.

  13. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Correction: The cartoon panels in question are hooked up in parallel, not in series as stated above. The potential difference between innocent and nefarious is quite low for the entire battery, but the power output is tripled when they are thus associated. Power is the process of creating and maintaining differences which may then be exploited.

  14. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Harry Neuman

    Stand your ground, which was not involved in the Zimmerman trial, is often used, and disproportionately so, by minorities in Florida. Also, the charges brought against Zimmerman were not about being stupid or over-stepping his role or authority. He was charged with murder, to which he pleaded self defense. He might lose a civil case on wrongful death for the reasons asserted, on the basis that it is believed that he initiated the situation by his own behavior. But that would be an entirely different trial. Maybe they should have done that instead of insisting on an arrest and a show trial when they already knew the police had nothing to go on to bring forward a prosecution.

  15. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 1 year ago


    I’ve sat on juries. I don’t have a problem with the verdict just with the law that allowed it to happen.
    If there is insufficient evidence, or in this case – reasonable doubt, the defendant is “Not Guilty.” But that doesn’t mean that his story is true, just that it is plausible.
    When you follow the law, you don’t always get justice.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).