Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin


Comments (34) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Far truer to reality, and not even in the realm of the paranoids.

  2. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Hoo-Boy! Here come ALL the 2nd Amendment trolls…

  3. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, about 1 year ago

    Those are the bodies of unarmed people who couldn’t defend themselves against criminals because of no-carry laws.

  4. PICTO

    PICTO said, about 1 year ago


    So if everybody has a gun then no one would get shot? Riiiiiiiight….

  5. tpenna

    tpenna said, about 1 year ago

    Right, ConserveGov. Because only unarmed people ever get shot.

  6. tpenna

    tpenna said, about 1 year ago

    Right, Ms. Ima. Lies like President Ronald Reagan, while surrounded by the most effective armed guards in the world, shot in a 1981 assassination attempt. Then, over a decade later, that same Reagan supported a ban on assault weapons.

  7. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago


    Let me ask you something. IF (now try to imagine this) you are an armed thief standing in the shadows around an ATM waiting for someone to walk up and get cash (picture it yet?) So you’re waiting and checking out potential victims (at this point I need to pee BAD) and you have a choice. One is obviously armed and paying attention to his surroundings but getting a STACK of 20’s.

    Do you get this one or do you wait for the next guy in line who is oblivious and carries no weapons?

    Now I know you are not a thief and would never even think about becoming one but please answer the question. Victim one or victim two?

  8. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago


    The first troll, and, a little truth from the conservative governor….However, when one troubles himself to look at the bigger picture….
    Hey !
    The Dark ages are over, are they not ?
    The age of man having to carry lethal means of protection is over….this I am 98% certain of….at least here in PA.
    Yes, we do have problems, and we should be using 21st century methods to solve them..
    Its the age of computers, records can be maintained to prevent the semi-insane and criminals from possessing lethal weapons..
    That the conservatives fear this so…are they the ones ??

  9. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago

    @Ms. Ima

    “This” would work, using my method of gun control..
    Google “England and guns”…. or Japan and guns…..or Canada and guns…

  10. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago

    As a child, Koolaid was a favorite, I am not longer a child and KoolAid is for children…but this is not true either….too much sugar….

  11. Jase99

    Jase99 said, about 1 year ago


    Yes, the conservative fantasy. The reality is that if that even if victim is armed, he has a gun trained on him. If he goes for it, he the mugger will likely shoot him. The mugger is most likely full of adrenalin, and will probably not hesitate to shoot at the slightest provocation. Or if the mugger is hiding in the shadows unseen, as is your scenario, he could just plain shoot the visibly armed victim and then take the cash.

  12. Harrison_Bergeron

    Harrison_Bergeron said, about 1 year ago

    @Adrian Snare

    You’re using England, where violent crime rates have skyrocketed since banning guns, as your example?!? Why not use Brazil? O right, because their gun crime rates are much much higher than ours, despite strict gun control laws. Why not mention Switzerland? O right, because their gun crime rates are much LOWER than our, despite widespread gun ownership. Why not compare the gun crime rates of NY and California to Vermont and New Hampshire? Why not compare the gun crime rates of cities like Chicago and DC to those of places that respect the natural human right to self-defense? O right, because those statistics don’t suit your anti-gun and anti-human agenda. Of course you’ll also ignore the many, many, many instances of private citizens using guns to defend themselves against violent criminals, which vastly outnumber instances of gun crimes. Because to “liberals”, reality isn’t what actually exists, or what’s actually true, reality is whatever is PC, whatever fits the radical leftist agenda of subjugating all people under totalitarian rule.

  13. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Actually they’re people killed by drunk drivers.

  14. Kylop

    Kylop said, about 1 year ago


    Picto, Bruce really needs an answer to this. He clearly spends a lot of time thinking about it

  15. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago


    Well just goes to show you’ve never been in the bushes as a thief.

    Do you know any nefarious people? Could you ask one of them which target is preferable?

    I carry. I’m observant. I’ve seen that situation unfold and by just being there it stopped with no one – even the thief – being harmed.

    But the thief was ONLY armed with a knife so maybe that was a factor and your point may have some validity. But in my case the knife went back into his pocket, the hands came to the forget it position and he turned to find easier pickings. Meanwhile the “authorities” were notified, people were warned and peace ruled the neighborhood. All because an observant person with a small concealed weapon revealed that fact at an opportune time.

    So fantasize this:




    Yep, it’s just my wildest imagination that conjurers up fantasy situations that never ever happen in REAL life.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (19).