Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin

Comments (36) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. then00b

    then00b said, 1 day ago

    Giving up white robes for black?

  2. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 1 day ago

    Guy in the back is chasing down a Coke.

  3. old1953

    old1953 said, 1 day ago

    Reminds me of a 60’s comic book group, the “Fatal Five”.

  4. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 1 day ago

    ??racist comic!! Really? The black guy can not vote? Why can he not vote? Sorry don’t get how the color of the skin makes it so some one can not vote?

  5. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 1 day ago

    And just to throw some more fuel on the fire, you have no “right to vote” in a federal election. just saying..

  6. jackhs106

    jackhs106 said, 1 day ago

    I still do not know what is so hard to get registered and have ID to vote. You have how many months and years between votes?

  7. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, 1 day ago

    I started to try and explain the issues here, but clearly there was no point. They didn’t want to hear it.
    But for those who are interested in knowing the FACTS here:

  8. mikefive

    mikefive said, 1 day ago


    If what is published on salon.com is actually Ginsberg’s dissent, much of it appears based on political dissent rather than Constitutionally based dissent (I’m to lazy today to look up the actual dissent).

  9. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, 1 day ago

    All five ‘conservatives’ on the Supreme Court are Catholic. Three of these ‘conservatives’ are MORE Catholic – ideologically speaking – than the Pope in Rome. There are no Methodists, Baptists, Episcopalians or Lutherans; there are NO Protestants AT ALL on the Supreme Court, NOT A ONE, and you may read in ANY history book that the United States of America was Country founded, fostered and brought to fruition by Protestants.
    VOTE, people. If we don’t vote, people who don’t represent us will be make OUR decisions. That ain’t democracy.

  10. Gary Kleppe

    Gary Kleppe said, 1 day ago

    Show us any example, any one will do, where when IDs weren’t required, evidence of voter fraud occurred in numbers large enough that it could’ve possibly affected the outcome of an election.

    Yes, I’ll wait.

  11. mshefler

    mshefler said, 1 day ago


    “All five ‘conservatives’ on the Supreme Court are Catholic”

    And we can blame that on JFK who broke the “Catholic barrier.”

  12. old1953

    old1953 said, 1 day ago

    LOL, really? Senate race is close in Georgia, so what does the Georgia Secy of State do? http://crooksandliars.com/2014/10/oops-georgias-secretary-state-lost-40000

  13. opednance

    opednance said, 1 day ago


    The voter IDs will cost the voter time and money which amounts to a poll tax. The GOP-requested changes are being implemented last minute – Texas has had their previous voting laws in place for 10 years now. New laws apply to in-person voting only so this is not equal application of the law.
    And the biggest reason that RGB is NOT being political is that the Texas law is where politics are being pushed. Negligible voter fraud that would be addressed by any of these changes.

  14. old1953

    old1953 said, 1 day ago

    Pretending Republicans are in favor of getting out the vote flies in the face of their own statements. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/28/republicans-admit-voter-id-laws-are-aimed-at-democratic-voters.html

    LOL, move a Republican off fantasy island and they have to quit voting Republican.

  15. Griff

    Griff GoComics PRO Member said, 1 day ago

    The new Taney Supreme Court.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (21).