The term “Living” document means that it is capable of changing with the times. I guess you prefer having slaves and only propertied white males voting?
“With liberty and justice for all” is not part of the Constitution, but most of us know the Pledge by heart. “For all” means everybody – which is what Darsan means. Not one rule for blacks and another for whites. Or one rule for corporations and another for the folks who work for those corporations. Or one rule for straights and another for gays.
Gorsuch hasn’t as yet answered any question except his name. I wouldn’t hire anyone that deflected every question about their previous jobs, would you?
Come on Republicans, WOULD YOU HIRE A PERSON THAT DEFLECTED EVERY QUESTION ABOUT PREVIOUS WORK? Yes or no?
Yes, Neil Gorsuch would be a flaming tragedy for employee rights and women’s health, but those would be pale shadows of the horrors he has in mind for separation of church and state.
It’s Fascinating that to the Republicans, ANY Judge that makes a ruling they DON’T like is “A Liberal, Activist Judge who is Legislating From The Bench!!!”, BUT, the exact same Judge making a ruling they DO like is “A Wise, Learned Jurist with a solid grasp of Constitutional Law!!!”. Funny how that works like that, huh Tom Wright??
Those who refuse to create laws themselves, in violation of the Constitution should not be Supreme Court justices because they won’t go along with those who oppose being a nation of laws rather than fads? Please remember if rights and powers fluctuate, they will sometimes go against you.
mr_sherman Premium Member about 7 years ago
The term “Living” document means that it is capable of changing with the times. I guess you prefer having slaves and only propertied white males voting?
walfishj about 7 years ago
I presume he’s already knocked down the china shop?
Dani Rice about 7 years ago
“With liberty and justice for all” is not part of the Constitution, but most of us know the Pledge by heart. “For all” means everybody – which is what Darsan means. Not one rule for blacks and another for whites. Or one rule for corporations and another for the folks who work for those corporations. Or one rule for straights and another for gays.
Radish the wordsmith about 7 years ago
Ha ha, its funny cause its true. “Who me side with corporations over people? Why shucks, golly, gee whiz…”
DrDon1 about 7 years ago
Remember that Gorsuch ruled that a trailer and its contents were more important than a man’s life! Corporations over people!
braindead Premium Member about 7 years ago
These comments again demonstrate that Republican voters do not understand who their real enemy is.
Teto85 Premium Member about 7 years ago
Well done and to the point. Thanks, Mr Benson.
old1953 about 7 years ago
Gorsuch hasn’t as yet answered any question except his name. I wouldn’t hire anyone that deflected every question about their previous jobs, would you?
Come on Republicans, WOULD YOU HIRE A PERSON THAT DEFLECTED EVERY QUESTION ABOUT PREVIOUS WORK? Yes or no?
Richard S Russell Premium Member about 7 years ago
Yes, Neil Gorsuch would be a flaming tragedy for employee rights and women’s health, but those would be pale shadows of the horrors he has in mind for separation of church and state.
Masterskrain Premium Member about 7 years ago
It’s Fascinating that to the Republicans, ANY Judge that makes a ruling they DON’T like is “A Liberal, Activist Judge who is Legislating From The Bench!!!”, BUT, the exact same Judge making a ruling they DO like is “A Wise, Learned Jurist with a solid grasp of Constitutional Law!!!”. Funny how that works like that, huh Tom Wright??
DrDon1 about 7 years ago
@MDAVIS – Ben Franklin warned us about you … someone who works real hard at being stupid!
David Huie Green LosersBlameOthers&It'sYOURfault about 7 years ago
Those who refuse to create laws themselves, in violation of the Constitution should not be Supreme Court justices because they won’t go along with those who oppose being a nation of laws rather than fads? Please remember if rights and powers fluctuate, they will sometimes go against you.