I’ve been waiting for someone else to give the answer to how old this coin is, but no one has said anything yet, so I guess it’s my turn.Coins do not have the initials B.C. or A.D. on the because B.C means Before Christ and A.D. are after the Dedication of Christ. I know A.D. in Anno D???? but I just can’t think of the Latin right now and am no Latin expert. Therefore, this old coin is a counterfeit no older than a few hundred years at the most.
The years “A.D.” didn’t start being used until the 6th century. Someone tried to calculate the year Christ was born, and then retroactively renumbered years from the Birth of Chrise as “Anno Domini” (Year of our Lord) years.
Y’alls assessment of the date on the coin is correct. The Romans could not possibly have dated their coins with an A.D. date. Besides that, they didn’t use the Arabic numbers, like 64. They used Roman numerals, like LXIV.
Most Roman Empire coins had a bust of the emperor on the obverse. coins were dated by knowing when the emperor ruled. Many roman Republic coins were minted by moneyers(sp). They stuck their name on the coin so you need to know when the moneyer was doing his thing.
I think there was a “Slylock Fox” strip for children that pointed out that arabic numbers and the letters AD on a coin make it an obvious fake. This strip won’t say so, though.
Tars Tarkas almost 8 years ago
I’ve been waiting for someone else to give the answer to how old this coin is, but no one has said anything yet, so I guess it’s my turn.Coins do not have the initials B.C. or A.D. on the because B.C means Before Christ and A.D. are after the Dedication of Christ. I know A.D. in Anno D???? but I just can’t think of the Latin right now and am no Latin expert. Therefore, this old coin is a counterfeit no older than a few hundred years at the most.
Jogger2 almost 8 years ago
The years “A.D.” didn’t start being used until the 6th century. Someone tried to calculate the year Christ was born, and then retroactively renumbered years from the Birth of Chrise as “Anno Domini” (Year of our Lord) years.
jhnd20 almost 8 years ago
Now that is funny
davidf42 almost 8 years ago
Y’alls assessment of the date on the coin is correct. The Romans could not possibly have dated their coins with an A.D. date. Besides that, they didn’t use the Arabic numbers, like 64. They used Roman numerals, like LXIV.
Dkram almost 8 years ago
Not only that, but, Roman dates were figured from the founding of the Roman Empire..\\//_
Russell Sketchley Premium Member almost 8 years ago
So did I, as well as Frank Nelson’s voice throughout. But then, we’re supposed to hear Frank Nelson’s “oooh!” right from the beginning.
Bob. almost 8 years ago
Most Roman Empire coins had a bust of the emperor on the obverse. coins were dated by knowing when the emperor ruled. Many roman Republic coins were minted by moneyers(sp). They stuck their name on the coin so you need to know when the moneyer was doing his thing.
furrykef almost 8 years ago
dkram: more likely they would have identified it as the tenth year of Nero’s reign. The “ab urbe condita” system of dating was relatively uncommon.
In any case, coins from Nero’s reign do not have dates of any kind on them.
I Go Pogo almost 8 years ago
Jim packs more artistry into the background of panel 1 than some strips exhibit in a month.
BeniHanna6 Premium Member almost 8 years ago
Interesting, a coin with A.D. on it, now that’s something new.
JanLC almost 8 years ago
I think there was a “Slylock Fox” strip for children that pointed out that arabic numbers and the letters AD on a coin make it an obvious fake. This strip won’t say so, though.
Banjo Gordy Premium Member almost 8 years ago
So Did I. WOW!