Working Daze by John Zakour and Scott Roberts for July 14, 2014

  1. Missing large
    michael.talvola  almost 10 years ago

    Sadly, this is very true (or used to be…).

     •  Reply
  2. Cat29
    x_Tech  almost 10 years ago

    Yeah, and you couldn’t code a FORTRAN output statement that won’t cause a print buffer overflow.So there!

     •  Reply
  3. Cookie icon
    chuuckcly Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    I prefer computed “Come-Froms”

     •  Reply
  4. Arthurheadshot
    CaptBullock  almost 10 years ago

    My idea of an APL programmer was someone who’d proudly come up to you and say “See this code? You’ll never guess what it does!”

     •  Reply
  5. Ic6
    karanne  almost 10 years ago

    Don’t look at me! The last thing I programmed in was Cobol.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    tsandl  almost 10 years ago

    Yeah, well you dereference null pointers and confuse “=” with “==” in your debugging code!

     •  Reply
  7. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  almost 10 years ago

    Your code is “write only” ‘cause even the computer can’t read it

     •  Reply
  8. Flash
    pschearer Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    Spaghetti coder!

    I once had a boss who couldn’t understand “i=i+1” because they obviously couldn’t be equal! I don’t know how he would react to “i++”.

     •  Reply
  9. Louis2
    PoodleGroomer  almost 10 years ago

    Your big ideas only need 16 bit addressing.

     •  Reply
  10. Wizanim
    ChessPirate  almost 10 years ago

    “You think you’re a programmer? I only program with ‘Copy con’!”

     •  Reply
  11. Lady dragoncat
    Dragoncat  almost 10 years ago

    Sigh… The boys are fighting again…

     •  Reply
  12. Js
    mightyfrog  almost 10 years ago

    Odd coincidence – I used to code COBOL in Hilo – not for long though… C came along

     •  Reply
  13. Js
    mightyfrog  almost 10 years ago

    Goto statements? Infinite Loops? What, is this 1984?

     •  Reply
  14. Little dash
    Shotgun15 Premium Member almost 10 years ago

    In 1971-72 I used Fortran 4, D level, COBOL with only 8KB RAM, PL1 (supposed to be an amalgam of those two – just terrible, but my nemesis was Assembler Language.God save us from writing in Machine Language. I always wanted to create the command: RFBB. (Retrieve from Bit Bucket) and it was to be used immediately following SRR or SLR in case of screw-up. However, I was never able to figure out the address for the Bit Bucket… :-(We all celebrated when our IBM 360, Mod 20 computer with 512KB RAM was upgraded to 1 MB. A real feat because the tch had to physically install 521 KB of Ferrite Core Storage.Remember, eight bits per bite – and rolls and rolls of yellow wire tape.We were fascinated by all the blinking lights on the console – one light per Register, as our programs were processing..Remember 2×1 to the 31st power? (IIRC) . . . You haven’t lived until you have had to debug nested Do Loops !

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    K M  almost 10 years ago
    I remember when they used to say that the [latest supercomputer] was so fast, it could execute an infinite loop in [some puny number of] microseconds!
     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Working Daze