No, he’s trying to avoid alienating the Legal Immigrants who have achieved Citizenship and CAN vote while being tough on their relatives with a less stable legal status.Tricky.
“He changes his story about as often as he changes his clothes. Whichever way the political wind is blowing is the way he faces.”It’s ok for Romney because he’s a Republican. It doesn’t count. It was utterly unacceptable for Clinton to be a political weather vain because he dared to win the election without being a Republican.
Yesterday MItty was on “their side”. Today, Obama merely pointed out Mitt promised to veto the “Dream Act”, or any similar. Now, he’s reversed himself? Hmmm, reminds me of the main French battle tank, one speed forward, 18 speeds in reverse.
I liked when John Boehner said that Obama had never even tried to pass this when the Democrats had the majority. The fact that the Dream act DID pass the house, and got 55 votes out of 100 in the senate, apparently doesn’t count. He also has to break a Republican filibuster for it to be a “try.”
Hmm, about those “rebel flareups” in southern Mexico. Which also, how ‘bout those Hondurans and Guatemalans who come up through Mexico to reach the states? Canada doesn’t ship people south, just oil, as our largest “foreign” source, but nobody wants to stop the flow of THAT!
Nebulous Premium Member almost 12 years ago
No, he’s trying to avoid alienating the Legal Immigrants who have achieved Citizenship and CAN vote while being tough on their relatives with a less stable legal status.Tricky.
Jason Allen almost 12 years ago
“He changes his story about as often as he changes his clothes. Whichever way the political wind is blowing is the way he faces.”It’s ok for Romney because he’s a Republican. It doesn’t count. It was utterly unacceptable for Clinton to be a political weather vain because he dared to win the election without being a Republican.
pirate227 almost 12 years ago
Time to break out that etch-a-sketch. LOL!
Dtroutma almost 12 years ago
Yesterday MItty was on “their side”. Today, Obama merely pointed out Mitt promised to veto the “Dream Act”, or any similar. Now, he’s reversed himself? Hmmm, reminds me of the main French battle tank, one speed forward, 18 speeds in reverse.
braindead Premium Member almost 12 years ago
Don’t they know that was only written on my etch-a-sketch?
pam Miner almost 12 years ago
Like all his attempts to blend in, he doesn’t. I think the Latinos are too smart to be fooled by this two faced liar.
ARodney almost 12 years ago
I liked when John Boehner said that Obama had never even tried to pass this when the Democrats had the majority. The fact that the Dream act DID pass the house, and got 55 votes out of 100 in the senate, apparently doesn’t count. He also has to break a Republican filibuster for it to be a “try.”
Dtroutma almost 12 years ago
Hmm, about those “rebel flareups” in southern Mexico. Which also, how ‘bout those Hondurans and Guatemalans who come up through Mexico to reach the states? Canada doesn’t ship people south, just oil, as our largest “foreign” source, but nobody wants to stop the flow of THAT!