Hey, folks, Wikipedia edit war going on I could use your help with. People have been repeatedly removing the image from the strip (and at one point the link itself) from the “list of webcomics” article claiming the strip is “not important.” Any wikieditors here want to give a hand?
I dunno Pab….I’ve been perusing message boards for a couple of years now and find the average intelligence of the posters to be not too high (this doesn’t include gocomics regulars who, for some reason, are a bit smarter). If this is a trend, and represents a microcosm of the rest of the general public (for point of reference, listen to a call-in radio show about your favorite sports team), then therefore it seems like utter folly to allow the same g.p. to edit a site dedicated to information and facts. I take the info provided by Wikipedia, with a big grain of salt.
DeclanBear over 14 years ago
How could it be boring with so many delightful aspects to recommend it?
zero over 14 years ago
I’m guessing no pictures
3hourtour Premium Member over 14 years ago
homosexual nude sex>boring?!?
ChiehHsia over 14 years ago
After the first two or three thousand times it all begins to seem familiar.
Pab Sungenis creator over 14 years ago
If you want my thoughts on a similar banned book, please read my essay “’The Catcher In The Rye:’ Why It Sucks.” http://cnx.com/?p=726
Pab Sungenis creator over 14 years ago
Folks: Good news. Book 4 went to the printers today. There is still time to pre-order a numbered and autographed copy, though!
Pab Sungenis creator over 14 years ago
Hey, folks, Wikipedia edit war going on I could use your help with. People have been repeatedly removing the image from the strip (and at one point the link itself) from the “list of webcomics” article claiming the strip is “not important.” Any wikieditors here want to give a hand?
Hugh B. Hayve over 14 years ago
I dunno Pab….I’ve been perusing message boards for a couple of years now and find the average intelligence of the posters to be not too high (this doesn’t include gocomics regulars who, for some reason, are a bit smarter). If this is a trend, and represents a microcosm of the rest of the general public (for point of reference, listen to a call-in radio show about your favorite sports team), then therefore it seems like utter folly to allow the same g.p. to edit a site dedicated to information and facts. I take the info provided by Wikipedia, with a big grain of salt.
Hugh B. Hayve over 14 years ago
133, it was second highest in my high school….so there! Let me ask you a question Susan, do you believe everything written on Wikipedia?