John Deering for March 18, 2024

  1. Avt freyjaw nurse48
    FreyjaRN Premium Member about 2 months ago

    Don’t count on it.

     •  Reply
  2. Question 63916 960 720
    knutdl  about 2 months ago

    White Coke? OMG!

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    aristoclesplato9  about 2 months ago

    What would the left have us believe? Willis did not lie?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    GroupiesOfPutin  about 2 months ago

    Now that they’ve harassed Fani Willis over a $4,000 vacation can we turn our attention to Clarence Thomas’s much more extravagant vacations, free tuition for a relative, free home for mom, and a forgiven loan on a $400,000 RV?

    It’s time to put Clarence Thomas on the stand and hear about all the kickbacks he has received. And indict his seditious treasonous wife.

     •  Reply
  5. John adams1
    Motivemagus  about 2 months ago

    Fortunately, this is not what happened. Instead, the (Republican) judge told Willis that she could not have her paramour as one of the team, but said the defense assertion that this was a conflict of interest that disqualified her and the case should be dismissed outright was nonsense – which of course it was. He dismissed some minor points, but left the main one intact, which one expert I read commented made it that much easier for her to accelerate the case, which is great, since #45’s court appointments clearly defer to him rather than the Constitution they swore an oath to.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    davidthoms1  about 2 months ago

    If Willis was spending her weekends turning tricks on street corners, just how would that make a difference in whether or not Trump is guilty?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    wndflower1  about 2 months ago

    trump and his lawyer prolly have no idea what the word “mendacity” even means!

     •  Reply
  8. Picture
    SammySnyder  about 2 months ago

    The definition of a politician is a mendacious mendicant. This is just political lawfare at it’s worst.

     •  Reply
  9. Kernel
    Diane Lee Premium Member about 2 months ago

    According to Georgia law, for a criminal defendant to prevail on a motion to disqualify the district attorney on grounds of a conflict of interest, the defendant seeking the disqualification must show by actual evidence that a conflict of interest exists AND that the conflict has a specific prejudicial effect in creating a condition of bias against the defendant. As to the first element, allegations were made that Fani Willis hired special prosecutor Nathan Wade because she was already involved in a romantic relationship and because it would benefit her financially, but none could come anywhere remotely close to being proven by evidence. The defendant could not produce ANY evidence that there was a relationship at the time Mr Wade was hired or that Fani Willis benefitted financially in any way. Fani Willis’ father, himself a respected attorney, testified that, at the time Mr Wade was hired, Fani was living with him in his home and had a different relationship and that Mr Wade never came on the scene until long after he was hired The bombshell, of course, is that Mr Wade was not even Ms Willis’ first choice. The former governor of Georgia, Roy Barnes (1999-2003), testified that Ms Willis had first contacted him and asked him to take the job, but he declined. As to the second element, even if an ethical violation had occurred which was never established by evidence, there is no indication at all that it created a condition of bias against the defendant specifically.

    At any rate, I want to personally apologize to Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis for this unwarranted intrusion into their private lives. I cheered for Willis on the stand and thank them both for enduring it.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    DrDon1  about 2 months ago

    tRump can now be a dictionary’s example for “mendacity!”

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From John Deering