Matt Gaetz mocked for saying Roe protesters are ‘over-educated’ millennials with ‘no Bumble matches’
“How many of the women rallying against overturning Roe are over-educated, under-loved millennials who sadly return from protests to a lonely microwave dinner with their cats, and no bumble matches?,” asked Mr Gaetz.
Many afterwards accused the congressman of being a “misogynist”, while others ridiculed Mr Gaetz for turning away younger voters.
“Just when you thought he couldn’t be more of a pathetic despicable loser… he says this,” one Twitter argued. “He is a menace to a functioning democratic society. And what a fool. He just got every millennial to vote against Republicans. Buh bye.. loser.”
“The very concept that a woman can be ‘over-educated’ tells me all I need to know about this,” another wrote. “And the idea that the only women who want rights must be unattractive and frigid is the oldest misogynistic trope in the book. This is a sitting member of Congress.”
The leak is not the problem. There is no law against it. This is not classified information. It is a court opinion. It is a court opinion written by partisan judge hacks that have no respect for the citizens of the USA that are not wealthy and/or using Religion against the freedoms of the citizens for the USA. Partisan Judge hacks that have proved they lied to Congress when they recognized Row vs Wade as settled law that should not be overturned. In this at the very least, several conservative judges need to be impeached an removed. The leak of the opinion is NOT against the law. LYING to Congress IS against the law.
1. Clarence Thomas refuses to recuse himself regarding the June 6 insurrection WHICH HIS WIFE HELPED ORGANIZE AND FUND.
2. At least two of the justices lied to Congress regarding their views of Roe.
3. Alito is deliberately trying to wipe out the implicit “Right to Privacy” established by Supreme Court precedent since 1923 (apparently aiming for the 100-year anniversary),
4. Alito is also pushing issues of fundamental rights down to the states, which is not acceptable. Note that the right to privacy led to Supreme Court decisions such as gay marriage, the anti-sodomy laws prior to that, the right to have access to contraception (also disliked by his particular brand of reactionary Catholic), and other issues. How long before states get to pass laws condemning gay marriage and even interracial marriage?
The only thing that has Robert’s et al, upset is they did not want this tidbit out until After teh mid-terms… They Do believe that Facism operates best behind a curtain of lies, or in total darkness. And this has spoilt their ‘gotcha!’ surprise they were planning on later this year.
There should be a law that makes the father of a child responsible for half the cost if it’s upbringing. With DNA tests it’s fairly easy to determine fatherhood.
Perhaps someone who wanted to ensure the original verbiage got out there before it got watered down. Perhaps the politically-active spouse of a severely compromised justice. Or something.
bagholder5150 almost 2 years ago
GO GET ’EM !!! (careful not to slip there)
ibFrank almost 2 years ago
First check out Justice Thomas and his wife Ginny, they probably know all about it.
kaffekup almost 2 years ago
“Don’t worry about the substance of the leak! All that’s important is, where did the leak come from? That’s what you should worry about!”
John Roberts
Radish the wordsmith almost 2 years ago
Matt Gaetz mocked for saying Roe protesters are ‘over-educated’ millennials with ‘no Bumble matches’
“How many of the women rallying against overturning Roe are over-educated, under-loved millennials who sadly return from protests to a lonely microwave dinner with their cats, and no bumble matches?,” asked Mr Gaetz.
Many afterwards accused the congressman of being a “misogynist”, while others ridiculed Mr Gaetz for turning away younger voters.
“Just when you thought he couldn’t be more of a pathetic despicable loser… he says this,” one Twitter argued. “He is a menace to a functioning democratic society. And what a fool. He just got every millennial to vote against Republicans. Buh bye.. loser.”
“The very concept that a woman can be ‘over-educated’ tells me all I need to know about this,” another wrote. “And the idea that the only women who want rights must be unattractive and frigid is the oldest misogynistic trope in the book. This is a sitting member of Congress.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/matt-gaetz-mocked-for-saying-roe-protesters-are-over-educated-millennials-with-no-bumble-matches/ar-AAWV048?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=7dbe542eb35347d09cd6bb8d8a51c4e6
Another lying republican rapist who demands women go full term.
Radish the wordsmith almost 2 years ago
The leak was a blow to the Supreme Court’s privacy, someone else made the decision for them.
Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member almost 2 years ago
This is actually rather puerile.
Rich Douglas almost 2 years ago
The “investigation” will go nowhere. The draft was likely leaked by a justice trying to get ahead of the tidal wave coming on this issue.
nyg16 almost 2 years ago
the “justice” and all the GQP are trying to deflect on the decision by all the outrage over the leak. I guess it hurt the dramatic effect.
MFRXIM Premium Member almost 2 years ago
Is that a dog, or a donkey?
ragsarooni Premium Member almost 2 years ago
“Too wittle,too wait”…..to quote Elmer Fudd…..;-)
GiantShetlandPony almost 2 years ago
The leak is not the problem. There is no law against it. This is not classified information. It is a court opinion. It is a court opinion written by partisan judge hacks that have no respect for the citizens of the USA that are not wealthy and/or using Religion against the freedoms of the citizens for the USA. Partisan Judge hacks that have proved they lied to Congress when they recognized Row vs Wade as settled law that should not be overturned. In this at the very least, several conservative judges need to be impeached an removed. The leak of the opinion is NOT against the law. LYING to Congress IS against the law.
Motivemagus almost 2 years ago
The actual scandals here:
1. Clarence Thomas refuses to recuse himself regarding the June 6 insurrection WHICH HIS WIFE HELPED ORGANIZE AND FUND.
2. At least two of the justices lied to Congress regarding their views of Roe.
3. Alito is deliberately trying to wipe out the implicit “Right to Privacy” established by Supreme Court precedent since 1923 (apparently aiming for the 100-year anniversary),
4. Alito is also pushing issues of fundamental rights down to the states, which is not acceptable. Note that the right to privacy led to Supreme Court decisions such as gay marriage, the anti-sodomy laws prior to that, the right to have access to contraception (also disliked by his particular brand of reactionary Catholic), and other issues. How long before states get to pass laws condemning gay marriage and even interracial marriage?
drbee almost 2 years ago
The only thing that has Robert’s et al, upset is they did not want this tidbit out until After teh mid-terms… They Do believe that Facism operates best behind a curtain of lies, or in total darkness. And this has spoilt their ‘gotcha!’ surprise they were planning on later this year.
FreyjaRN Premium Member almost 2 years ago
That looks about right.
painthacker Premium Member almost 2 years ago
There should be a law that makes the father of a child responsible for half the cost if it’s upbringing. With DNA tests it’s fairly easy to determine fatherhood.
FrankErnesto almost 2 years ago
“Was it you? Remember, you are under oath. Not me, your honor . snicker, snicker”
Rich Douglas almost 2 years ago
Perhaps someone who wanted to ensure the original verbiage got out there before it got watered down. Perhaps the politically-active spouse of a severely compromised justice. Or something.