Wow you’re cold hearted Dale. Lets see where your prized Obama/Biden ticket gets us. Higher unemployment rates, a completely failed education system, or even, maybe, more of us, tax payers, supporting illegal income earning “baby’s mamas.” Oh don’t forget our military will be cut, leaving us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.
Um, deviouslylost, where have you been the past few years? That’s describing the US now, except instead of supporting a few unwed mothers (and there would be more when McCain/Palin ban abortion, right?), we’re giving out megabucks in corporate welfare. No, wait - gigabucks.
deviouslylost, I don’t see where your predictions are coming from. “Higher unemployment rates”–comparing the years in which Republican presidents submitted budgets against those in which Democratic presidents submitted budgets from Kennedy to Clinton, Democrats did better on unemployment–5.1% to 6.75%.
“a completely failed education system”–Please explain how recreating segregation by sapping money from public schools to run private schools for those who can afford them will help the state of education in this country.
“more of us, tax payers, supporting illegal income earning “baby’s mamas.”“–oh, come on. Say “welfare queen”. Say it. You know you want to. Then go on about how racist it is that black people don’t seem to want to vote Republican.
“our military will be cut, leaving us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks”–I refer you to those socialist hippies at the RAND Corporation, in monograph MG741-1. (Google it.) In short, military force has historically been utterly ineffective at dealing with terrorist groups; those groups that have ended were almost always either defeated by police tactics or joined the political process.
But I suppose that’s likely too nuanced for you, right?
dhleaky over 15 years ago
progan01, I would rather be radioactive ash. That would be NO heaven.
CorosiveFrog Premium Member over 15 years ago
progan01 LOL +5!!!
I’m a buddhist, so I’ll probably reincarnate…hopefully int a scorpion, scorpions can resist a nuclear blast.
jimbo90036 over 15 years ago
Palin reads the future
ConservativeBob over 15 years ago
I would have to say that line about “starting a nuclear war” is a bit too much.
Motivemagus over 15 years ago
Why not launch a nuclear war, if she believes these are the End Times? It might be her duty to bring it on!
MaryWorth Premium Member over 15 years ago
As if flowers would exist in 2065!
Alexus_The_Great over 15 years ago
Dale: so the winning ticket was Jef Bush/Sarah Palin in 2049, right???
LOL!
deviouslylost over 15 years ago
Wow you’re cold hearted Dale. Lets see where your prized Obama/Biden ticket gets us. Higher unemployment rates, a completely failed education system, or even, maybe, more of us, tax payers, supporting illegal income earning “baby’s mamas.” Oh don’t forget our military will be cut, leaving us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.
Motivemagus over 15 years ago
Um, deviouslylost, where have you been the past few years? That’s describing the US now, except instead of supporting a few unwed mothers (and there would be more when McCain/Palin ban abortion, right?), we’re giving out megabucks in corporate welfare. No, wait - gigabucks.
grendelkhan over 15 years ago
deviouslylost, I don’t see where your predictions are coming from. “Higher unemployment rates”–comparing the years in which Republican presidents submitted budgets against those in which Democratic presidents submitted budgets from Kennedy to Clinton, Democrats did better on unemployment–5.1% to 6.75%.
“a completely failed education system”–Please explain how recreating segregation by sapping money from public schools to run private schools for those who can afford them will help the state of education in this country.
“more of us, tax payers, supporting illegal income earning “baby’s mamas.”“–oh, come on. Say “welfare queen”. Say it. You know you want to. Then go on about how racist it is that black people don’t seem to want to vote Republican.
“our military will be cut, leaving us more vulnerable to terrorist attacks”–I refer you to those socialist hippies at the RAND Corporation, in monograph MG741-1. (Google it.) In short, military force has historically been utterly ineffective at dealing with terrorist groups; those groups that have ended were almost always either defeated by police tactics or joined the political process.
But I suppose that’s likely too nuanced for you, right?