Tim Campbell for September 01, 2021

  1. Missing large
    DIF20  over 2 years ago

    such a shame to see animals taking over a country

     •  Reply
  2. Albert einstein brain i6
    braindead Premium Member over 2 years ago

    13,000 troops in Afghanistan when The Best Negotiator In Human History signed the treaty with the terrorists.

    2,500 troops when Biden was inaugurated after the failed insurrection. And a sabotaged visa procedure.

    And STILL 123,000 evacuated.

     •  Reply
  3. Tor johnson
    William Bednar Premium Member over 2 years ago

    “No problem, Taliban”, says the NRA. “We’ll keep the War Stuff coming”.

     •  Reply
  4. Img 0132 fotor
    stick&rudder  over 2 years ago

    What were 100,000 Americans doing in Afghanistan?

     •  Reply
  5. Screenshot 20180802 120401 samsung internet
    Kurtass Premium Member over 2 years ago

    @DIF20, I agree, you are speaking of the insurrectionists on January 6th 2021.

     •  Reply
  6. 7bf81e16 8ef8 4134 8774 9ce680cc41b6
    The Nodding Head  over 2 years ago

    The Taliban won’t be able to operate that equipment without proper maintenance and parts. American corporations aren’t greedy enough to supply them.

    Are they?

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    preacherman  over 2 years ago

    I understand most of the equipment has been rendered useless, at least in the near frame of time. With some repair, they may be put back into use.

     •  Reply
  8. Scout 3a
    Redd Panda  over 2 years ago

    Maybe they’ll start an online, war surplus site?

    I’ve been looking for a vehicle with a mess of wheels on it. Maybe pickup an APC at a good price? Shipping $$ might be a deal buster.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    john_chubb  over 2 years ago

    The military “unrecoverably destroyed” most of the military equipment they left behind.

    Now they “need” to buy replacements – more $$$ for the Military Industrial Complex, straight from taxpayer’s pockets.

     •  Reply
  10. Can flag
    Alberta Oil Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Pretty sure there are a few nations willing to take them apart for scrap (or the technology).

     •  Reply
  11. Screenshot 2020 12 31 at 9.22.22 am
    codak  over 2 years ago

    seems like a colossal waste, I would have thought they could’ve flown more of the aircraft out , and driven some of the other stuff to our ally? Pakistan

     •  Reply
  12. Missing large
    walfishj  over 2 years ago

    So Tim Campbell is one of those persons who value material objects over people. I guess that makes him a republican.

     •  Reply
  13. 1
    ncorgbl  over 2 years ago

    All heavy equipment, aircraft, track vehicles, big guns, are inoperable. The U.S. gives/lends/sells weapons, even to our allies, with a chip that we can disable from our satellites.

     •  Reply
  14. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 2 years ago

    The USA military contractors loved the tax payer dollars to pay for it.

     •  Reply
  15. Pine marten3
    martens  over 2 years ago

    “ALL EQUIPMENT should be demanded to be immediately returned to the United States, and that includes every penny of the $85 billion dollars in cost.”

    — Former president Donald Trump, in a statement, Aug 30

    The Facts

    The $83 billion figure — technically, $82.9 billion — comes from an estimate in the July 30 quarterly report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) for all spending on the Afghanistan Security Forces Fund since the U.S. invasion in 2001.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/31/no-taliban-did-not-seize-83-billion-us-weapons/

     •  Reply
  16. Photo 1501706362039 c06b2d715385
    Zebrastripes  over 2 years ago

    Taliban will never repair anything plus it was all demilitarized…

     •  Reply
  17. Missing large
    inevattable  over 2 years ago

    In praise of ‘built-in obsolescence’

     •  Reply
  18. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  over 2 years ago

    Remember when Trump abandoned the Kurds and gave our military bases to the Russians?

     •  Reply
  19. Img 1754  2
    GiantShetlandPony  over 2 years ago

    The only functional equipment they have are gifts from the Afghan military that largely rolled over on their back for Taliban belly rubs.

    The military equipment left by the USA will only be good for photo ops, as it will not be functional. It will be like all the pictures of broken down Russian tanks and vehicles that litters the Afghanistan landscape.

     •  Reply
  20. Missing large
    ferddo  over 2 years ago

    Taliban is already complaining about the disabled conditions that the U.S. military left that equipment in… the Taliban expected it to be gifts in prime working condition…

     •  Reply
  21. Durak ukraine
    Durak Premium Member over 2 years ago

    Doesn’t seem like Campbell has ever served in the military. Or, if he did, he never deployed.

    One thing all military learn when they deploy is how to decommission equipment. Make it so that it doesn’t work anymore. We’re GOOD at it.

    Yeah, the Taliban is parading around with a lot of gear, taking pictures, and guys like Jeff are quick to point and shout, “Shame!”

    But that equipment isn’t going to work. Or, if they can coax it into operation, it won’t work long or fulfill it’s function.

    Other than to serve as a propaganda tool for the, well, Republican tools.

     •  Reply
  22.  k3 6383
    AndrewSharpe  over 2 years ago

    The equipment was reportedly disabled before we left. https://www.stripes.com/theaters/middle_east/2021-08-31/kabul-airport-us-military-equipment-abandoned-afghanistan-taliban-2730959.html

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment