If race TRULY would not be a factor then I would be all for it… problem is that’s not the case… never has been… which is why Affirmative Action exists in the first place. How will make sure race is not a factor? Will they take the race question off the application… cancel any in person meetings before acceptance… don’t require a name/address/high school name or address?? No. This is just another BS ploy by Trump to keep his Bigot Base happy.
It may be the 21st century on the calendar, but it’s still 1861, and it will always be 1861, in the former CSA. President Davis said so, and R.E. Lee will enforce that.
@guyjen2004: “I guess we should judge people by the color of their skin?”
Absolutely not!
It should be based on DNA. If there’s even 1/10th of a percent of non-European-“white” in their ancestry, then they should be classed as “inferior” and undesirable. /s
NeoconMan about 5 years ago
This is wonderful. We shall once again achieve a class-based society as dictated by skin colour and wealth.
Jimathai Premium Member about 5 years ago
If race TRULY would not be a factor then I would be all for it… problem is that’s not the case… never has been… which is why Affirmative Action exists in the first place. How will make sure race is not a factor? Will they take the race question off the application… cancel any in person meetings before acceptance… don’t require a name/address/high school name or address?? No. This is just another BS ploy by Trump to keep his Bigot Base happy.
William Bednar Premium Member about 5 years ago
Well, we got part way, children are judged by the color of their money!
William Bednar Premium Member about 5 years ago
It may be the 21st century on the calendar, but it’s still 1861, and it will always be 1861, in the former CSA. President Davis said so, and R.E. Lee will enforce that.
gammaguy about 5 years ago
@guyjen2004: “I guess we should judge people by the color of their skin?”
Absolutely not!
It should be based on DNA. If there’s even 1/10th of a percent of non-European-“white” in their ancestry, then they should be classed as “inferior” and undesirable. /s