Strzok’s firing is just the latest item in the purge of all FBI officials that Comey told about his conversation with Trump where Trump cleared the room of everyone else and demanded Comey’s loyalty to him, Trump, and not to the United States nor its Constitution.
Comey immediately documented the conversation and shared his notes with half a dozen senior FBI officials. All but one of those senior officials have been purged by Trump.
.
So no, Lisa, it was NOT something he said. It was/is so that Strzok can no longer testify about the conversation as a sitting FBI official.
.
And destroying people’s careers in the process, was just icing on the cake for Trump and His Disciples.
Of course it was something he said. Even the Justice Dept report that led to this determined there wasn’t any shred of proof that he’d actually done anything wrong.
Peter Strzok has had a long and distinguished FBI career, defending the United States against enemies foreign and domestic, especially foreign. Donald Trump’s presidency has been marked by its steadily giving aid and comfort to one of those enemies. America would be greater with a man like Strzok in the Oval Office and Trump in the garbage.
Suppose YOU were accused of something at your work. HR assured you that the allegations would be investigated, but later you learned that one of the investigators, ABCX, emailed, BEFORE you were hired, that he despised you, and that you were unfit to be in the job, and that he would do all in his power to see that you were not hired. Still later, ABCX assured yet another investigator that yes, he did send that email, but he would never allow his personal bias, thoughts and feelings, to interfere in his unbiased job performance. Another investigator looking at ABCX’s behavior recommends that ABCX be disciplined, for this and additional lapses in behaivior. An arbiter says maybe 60 day suspension? What’s your opinion? What would an appropriate level of discipline entail?
Radish the wordsmith over 5 years ago
The leader of the FBI Russian investigation fired,
Trump is obviously innocent, there is no one left to testify against him.
genome_project Premium Member over 5 years ago
A GoFundMe page opened on Monday for fired FBI agent Peter Strzok raised $325,000 in one day.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/13/peter-strzok-gofundme/983571002/
Nantucket Premium Member over 5 years ago
Firing Strzok was a political move by Trumpettes in Congress.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/congressmans-son-rips-him-ruining-fbi-agents-career-223220544—election.html
braindead Premium Member over 5 years ago
Strzok’s firing is just the latest item in the purge of all FBI officials that Comey told about his conversation with Trump where Trump cleared the room of everyone else and demanded Comey’s loyalty to him, Trump, and not to the United States nor its Constitution.
Comey immediately documented the conversation and shared his notes with half a dozen senior FBI officials. All but one of those senior officials have been purged by Trump.
.
So no, Lisa, it was NOT something he said. It was/is so that Strzok can no longer testify about the conversation as a sitting FBI official.
.
And destroying people’s careers in the process, was just icing on the cake for Trump and His Disciples.
Judge Magney over 5 years ago
Of course it was something he said. Even the Justice Dept report that led to this determined there wasn’t any shred of proof that he’d actually done anything wrong.
Peter Strzok has had a long and distinguished FBI career, defending the United States against enemies foreign and domestic, especially foreign. Donald Trump’s presidency has been marked by its steadily giving aid and comfort to one of those enemies. America would be greater with a man like Strzok in the Oval Office and Trump in the garbage.
Dtroutma over 5 years ago
“Thou shalt not comment on the reality of idiot Trump”. Ten commandments in government today, no matter what agency, public or private. Only one rule.
Holden Awn over 5 years ago
Suppose YOU were accused of something at your work. HR assured you that the allegations would be investigated, but later you learned that one of the investigators, ABCX, emailed, BEFORE you were hired, that he despised you, and that you were unfit to be in the job, and that he would do all in his power to see that you were not hired. Still later, ABCX assured yet another investigator that yes, he did send that email, but he would never allow his personal bias, thoughts and feelings, to interfere in his unbiased job performance. Another investigator looking at ABCX’s behavior recommends that ABCX be disciplined, for this and additional lapses in behaivior. An arbiter says maybe 60 day suspension? What’s your opinion? What would an appropriate level of discipline entail?