Suppose YOU were accused of something at your work. HR assured you that the allegations would be investigated, but later you learned that one of the investigators, ABCX, emailed, BEFORE you were hired, that he despised you, and that you were unfit to be in the job, and that he would do all in his power to see that you were not hired. Still later, ABCX assured yet another investigator that yes, he did send that email, but he would never allow his personal bias, thoughts and feelings, to interfere in his unbiased job performance. Another investigator looking at ABCX’s behavior recommends that ABCX be disciplined, for this and additional lapses in behaivior. An arbiter says maybe 60 day suspension? What’s your opinion? What would an appropriate level of discipline entail?
Suppose YOU were accused of something at your work. HR assured you that the allegations would be investigated, but later you learned that one of the investigators, ABCX, emailed, BEFORE you were hired, that he despised you, and that you were unfit to be in the job, and that he would do all in his power to see that you were not hired. Still later, ABCX assured yet another investigator that yes, he did send that email, but he would never allow his personal bias, thoughts and feelings, to interfere in his unbiased job performance. Another investigator looking at ABCX’s behavior recommends that ABCX be disciplined, for this and additional lapses in behaivior. An arbiter says maybe 60 day suspension? What’s your opinion? What would an appropriate level of discipline entail?