Gary Varvel for April 19, 2017

  1. Frank
    Frankfreak  about 7 years ago

    A bluff is another form of lying. Trump IS good at that.

     •  Reply
  2. 00000
    alondra  about 7 years ago

    Hardly a bluff Fat Boy. Learn a lesson from it!

     •  Reply
  3. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 7 years ago

    Republicans are dangerous.

     •  Reply
  4. Deboyz2
    dunedin15  about 7 years ago

    Mother of All Bluffs?

     •  Reply
  5. Bill
    Mr. Blawt  about 7 years ago

    Trump isn’t bluffing, he has no strategy, you can’t bluff if you have no idea how to play the game. Trump has been betting on what ever cards land in his mitts, his poll numbers show he has had more losing hands than winning. His bomb dropping excited the war mongers, but most have seen through these as just yet another distraction from the daily Russian links that are turned up for his pre-(minority win)-election collusion.

     •  Reply
  6. Bbb
    NeoconMan  about 7 years ago

    I just had a terrible thought: what if they gave a war and nobody came?

     •  Reply
  7. Minifig2
    Aliquid  about 7 years ago

    Kim Jong-un doesn’t believe Trump is bluffing. He is completely convinced that Trump will come after North Korea. The thing is… his response is to defend himself and prepare to fight back, rather than back down. Even if the odds aren’t in his favor.

     •  Reply
  8. Milo headshot
    XtopherSD  about 7 years ago

    Yes, because a few dozen ISIS fighters in caves are just like the ruler of a country with nuclear weapons. Sure…

     •  Reply
  9. Video snapshot
    Baslim the Beggar Premium Member about 7 years ago

    Hilarious. In 1994, it was estimated that a war on the Korean peninsula would cost “a million and a trillion.” That’s lives and dollars. Neither projected cost has not diminished with time.

    We’ve had the ability to strike very hard at Korea for some time with a variety of weapons. Only morons think that a weapon that is delivered by a C-130 is a game changer. That C-130 doesn’t get anywhere near the little punk unless NK’s air defense has been taken out already … by the weapons that have been in place for years.

    And you can bet the little punk will be in a deep, shielded bunker. NK has a lot of those. Which one, you fools?

    Conservatives, willing to see trillions spent for killing “other” people in numbers large or small on some stupid premise.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    walfishj  about 7 years ago

    Because of its size and weight, the MOAB has to be delivered by a C-135 with a top speed of 250. A North Korea fighting kite could take it out. This is not going to happen.

     •  Reply
  11. Video snapshot
    Baslim the Beggar Premium Member about 7 years ago

    Oh, and for the fools who think that dropping big bombs on the leaders we love to hate is so effective:

    Saddam Hussein (We bombed women and children in a shelter)

    Gaddafi (missed by that much: killed his little girl)

    Osama bin Laden (missed him, too)

    Think about it. Even the only terrorist “leaders” killed by drone, were killed by a specially targeted missile, and only then because they lacked the protection of a national government, making them isolated targets, in low population areas.

    Go back further. Hitler, Mussolini, and the Japanese leadership survived massive bombing. As did Churchill.

     •  Reply
  12. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 7 years ago

    Donnie Dumpster is playing way out of his league. Fortunately, the South Koreans, who SHOULD be the ones calling the shots, aren’t as concerned as we are. Also North Korean conventional artillery can already flatte Seoul in a matter of minutes, and the South has a pretty decent Air Force, so it’s a lot more complicated than the dumpster will ever understand.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment