Reporter: Are they motivated by ideology or religion? Are they mentally ill? Man: Is he talking about the shooters? Woman: No... he's talking about politicians opposed to sensible gun laws!
LIARS -get the facts straight, not from liberal talk shows
According to the FBI, only 21 of the 355 shootings identified by the anti-gunners can actually be categorized as mass murder with a firearm.http://www.infowars.com/no-there-have-not-been-355-mass-shootings-this-year/
America’s states and feds already have “sensible gun laws”.California is one of the most strict on gun laws.But the MSM is ignorant about guns and gun laws….see this article “ATF Says Weapons Used in San Bernardino Shooting Were Illegal in California.”-https://pjmedia.com/trending/2015/12/4/atf-says-weapons-used-in-san-bernardino-shooting-were-illegal-in-california#-“Modifying a gun for fully automatic fire is illegal in every state. It is a federal law, a very serious federal law.”-The terrorists in this shooting modified legally purchased guns which made those guns ILLEGAL in use. (quote from ATF special agent Meredith Davis.)-The shooters also used guns illegally, guns that were purchased by someone else, and illegally transferred or given to the shooters who were not registered as owners.-Use Salt generously on MSM “narrative” reporting; they support Obama and the Leftwingers who want all guns banned, leaving Americans unarmed.
Conservatives aren’t desperate at all. That’s why they’re eager to point out that not enough people have died in this shooting or that to make it a mass murder — and they’re hoping nobody noticed the switcheroo from “mass shooting” to “mass murder” that they just pulled.
You think laws are expected to automatically prevent people from doing illegal things? If so, why would they need policemen on the highway after they put up speed limit signs?.Laws are in place largely to punish those who break them in the expectation that others will learn from example.
kevinanne said, about 7 hours ago @disgustedamerican “Well you want all Syrians banned from coming to America because a few might be crazy and kill some people, right? Same logic”-What post did you see in my name that said what you claim?-I am against the way the refugee-to-USA Obama plan is being set up. Only Muslims supposedly from the refugee camps will be accepted. There is no Syrian data base that can identify “safe” and “without Jihadism’s agenda” for selected “refugees”….it is known that militant Jihadists have used the “refugee free ticket” to infiltrate into European countries. I am against importing activists or people like Seyed Farook who looked “safe” but turned violent, supposedly shocking his own family, but leaving a residence filled with weapons, ammo, and an IED factory! The Farooks didn’t erase their devices because they had been “safe” and harmless to Americans!-FBI Director Comey said today that the case is now a case of Terrorism, and the FBI will try to salvage what the Farooks tried to erase. -And btw, American Muslims (CAIR, et al, and the Farook family attorneys) are doing public image polishings, using the Islamic age-old tactic of Taqiyya. (sacred lying and deception).
While the nation suffered through the shock of another bloody massacre, on Thursday every Senate Republican except Mark Kirk of Illinois voted against legislation to prevent people on the F.B.I.’s consolidated terrorist watchlist from purchasing guns or explosives.
The measure has been introduced repeatedly since 2007. The Government Accountability Office has documented that over years of congressional blockage, hundreds of suspected terrorists on the watchlist bought guns.
Another bill that would have expanded background checks to gun show and online firearms sales to screen out convicted felons and the mentally ill also failed on Thursday. The four Republican senators running for president — Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham — all turned up to vote against these common-sense measures.
Ottodesu over 8 years ago
Already too late …
coreman over 8 years ago
LIARS -get the facts straight, not from liberal talk shows
According to the FBI, only 21 of the 355 shootings identified by the anti-gunners can actually be categorized as mass murder with a firearm.http://www.infowars.com/no-there-have-not-been-355-mass-shootings-this-year/
kline0800 over 8 years ago
America’s states and feds already have “sensible gun laws”.California is one of the most strict on gun laws.But the MSM is ignorant about guns and gun laws….see this article “ATF Says Weapons Used in San Bernardino Shooting Were Illegal in California.”-https://pjmedia.com/trending/2015/12/4/atf-says-weapons-used-in-san-bernardino-shooting-were-illegal-in-california#-“Modifying a gun for fully automatic fire is illegal in every state. It is a federal law, a very serious federal law.”-The terrorists in this shooting modified legally purchased guns which made those guns ILLEGAL in use. (quote from ATF special agent Meredith Davis.)-The shooters also used guns illegally, guns that were purchased by someone else, and illegally transferred or given to the shooters who were not registered as owners.-Use Salt generously on MSM “narrative” reporting; they support Obama and the Leftwingers who want all guns banned, leaving Americans unarmed.
Kip W over 8 years ago
Conservatives aren’t desperate at all. That’s why they’re eager to point out that not enough people have died in this shooting or that to make it a mass murder — and they’re hoping nobody noticed the switcheroo from “mass shooting” to “mass murder” that they just pulled.
lesmcf over 8 years ago
Oh to be back in the peacful days before the Supreme Court misinterpreted the 2nd amendment.
Kip W over 8 years ago
You think laws are expected to automatically prevent people from doing illegal things? If so, why would they need policemen on the highway after they put up speed limit signs?.Laws are in place largely to punish those who break them in the expectation that others will learn from example.
sofartotheleftimright over 8 years ago
Question? Why do we have to have a separation for murders and mass murders?
Dtroutma over 8 years ago
Right on the money, Rob.
kline0800 over 8 years ago
kevinanne said, about 7 hours ago @disgustedamerican “Well you want all Syrians banned from coming to America because a few might be crazy and kill some people, right? Same logic”-What post did you see in my name that said what you claim?-I am against the way the refugee-to-USA Obama plan is being set up. Only Muslims supposedly from the refugee camps will be accepted. There is no Syrian data base that can identify “safe” and “without Jihadism’s agenda” for selected “refugees”….it is known that militant Jihadists have used the “refugee free ticket” to infiltrate into European countries. I am against importing activists or people like Seyed Farook who looked “safe” but turned violent, supposedly shocking his own family, but leaving a residence filled with weapons, ammo, and an IED factory! The Farooks didn’t erase their devices because they had been “safe” and harmless to Americans!-FBI Director Comey said today that the case is now a case of Terrorism, and the FBI will try to salvage what the Farooks tried to erase. -And btw, American Muslims (CAIR, et al, and the Farook family attorneys) are doing public image polishings, using the Islamic age-old tactic of Taqiyya. (sacred lying and deception).
kaffekup over 8 years ago
This ‘toon is ridiculous. Nobody in the corporate media is ever going to say anything harsh about the NRA’s Congressional shills.
markjoseph125 over 8 years ago
While the nation suffered through the shock of another bloody massacre, on Thursday every Senate Republican except Mark Kirk of Illinois voted against legislation to prevent people on the F.B.I.’s consolidated terrorist watchlist from purchasing guns or explosives.
The measure has been introduced repeatedly since 2007. The Government Accountability Office has documented that over years of congressional blockage, hundreds of suspected terrorists on the watchlist bought guns.
Another bill that would have expanded background checks to gun show and online firearms sales to screen out convicted felons and the mentally ill also failed on Thursday. The four Republican senators running for president — Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham — all turned up to vote against these common-sense measures.
kaffekup over 8 years ago
Nor have you said anything that isn’t a “personal attack”…
kurt.zwicky over 8 years ago
Profile # 1333993. Comes across as a real sicko. Needs help.