The intelligence community says the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria is not a threat to the U.S. But that could change. They might get really angry at us. Why would they get angry at us? Well, we are bombing them...
Hey Comrade Ted.The Islamic State terrorists have already publicly stated they’re working on an attack on the US homeland.You were against stopping OBL under Clinton too. Then those Islamic terrorists killed 3000 innocent Americans.Is your plan to just wave the white flag?
That is an absolutely brilliant reply from Hillary. It doesn’t seem to be true that she said it, though? Considering how many other dumb things she has said, it’s odd that this one lingers.
ConserveGov over 9 years ago
Hey Comrade Ted.The Islamic State terrorists have already publicly stated they’re working on an attack on the US homeland.You were against stopping OBL under Clinton too. Then those Islamic terrorists killed 3000 innocent Americans.Is your plan to just wave the white flag?
Michael Peterson Premium Member over 9 years ago
Henry Ford felt the same way back in the ’30s.
TripleAxel over 9 years ago
Notably, in bombing Syria we are taking far less precautions against civilian deaths than Israel used when we criticized its actions against Hamas.
Ted Rall creator over 9 years ago
Genius.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Bombing ’em better since ’91, what could possibly go wrong?
TripleAxel over 9 years ago
http://www.idfblog.com/blog/2014/07/16/idf-done-minimize-harm-civilians-gaza/-http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/Report-US-lifts-restrictions-on-Syria-airstrikes-likely-to-result-in-civilian-deaths-377768-https://www.emptywheel.net/2014/09/30/us-air-strikes-in-syria-proceeding-as-expected-civilian-deaths-documented-isis-recruitment-up/
yusodum over 9 years ago
That is an absolutely brilliant reply from Hillary. It doesn’t seem to be true that she said it, though? Considering how many other dumb things she has said, it’s odd that this one lingers.