And yet they praised the eloquence and brillance of Caribou Barbie. Things could have been worse, far worse, but at least she’d have quit half way through any first term.
Just a note on “politics” today: pointing out facts isn’t a “slur”, well unless it’s pointing out the failings of the most radical, who typically are also the least informed among us.
Nebulous Premium Member over 9 years ago
That’s exactly what they said about Bush the First and Dan Quayle, but then they went and elected Quayle’s dumber brother.
Kylop over 9 years ago
And they were right about Quayle
ruthkando over 9 years ago
I don’t get the logic; is there any? Or is it just another partisan way to smear two good men?
Observer fo Irony over 9 years ago
@Ruth KantorIt also means that the target of opportunity will more often be Biden than Obama.
WestNYC Premium Member over 9 years ago
Biden and Quayle (both awful) made their President’s look great by comparison; that’s why they were selected.
hypernova over 9 years ago
Even Ramirez doesn’t know the difference between “insure” and “ensure”. Seems nobody does.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
And yet they praised the eloquence and brillance of Caribou Barbie. Things could have been worse, far worse, but at least she’d have quit half way through any first term.
Dtroutma over 9 years ago
Just a note on “politics” today: pointing out facts isn’t a “slur”, well unless it’s pointing out the failings of the most radical, who typically are also the least informed among us.