Shoe by Gary Brookins and Susie MacNelly for June 04, 2013

  1. Missing large
    t_a_80111  almost 11 years ago

    Somebody needs a math refresher course.

     •  Reply
  2. Pirate63
    Linguist  almost 11 years ago

    The Perfesser has Dunlaps disease – his belly done laps over his belt.

     •  Reply
  3. Picture 22
    jack fairbanks  almost 11 years ago

    gotta put a white belt on him so we can tell if he’s walkin’ or rollin’…

     •  Reply
  4. Ricky ricardo oh lucy
    edclectic  almost 11 years ago

    I prefer the times when portly was a sign of affluence.

     •  Reply
  5. Avitar
    EarlP2  almost 11 years ago

    A 50 inch waist, converted to hexadecimal would be 32 …

     •  Reply
  6. Avitar
    EarlP2  almost 11 years ago

    Then there are those who buy the same size waist as when they were not so portly — they just wear them lower.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    crcesc  almost 11 years ago

    Just weighed myself. I’m a size tent-and-a-half!

     •  Reply
  8. Ngc891 rs 580x527
    alan.gurka  almost 11 years ago

    I wear the same size pants as I did 40 years ago. No, I haven’t remainded the same, it’s the pants manufacturers that cheat and put in elastic bands and call them “relaxed fit.”

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    tlynnch  almost 11 years ago

    My 36" wasted pants felt loose so I measured my waist, 40". Pant manufacturers are lying to all of us!

     •  Reply
  10. Avitar
    EarlP2  almost 11 years ago

    50 inches or 128 cm, both are DECIMAL.Going METRIC makes the waist size larger unless, as someone said, you use decimeters (12.8) or meters (1.28). 50 (dec)= 32(hex); 128(dec)= 80(hex)I’ve taught all this stuff for years …

     •  Reply
  11. Sany0002
    danlarios  almost 11 years ago

    to late for me

     •  Reply
  12. Colclausav
    ColonelClaus  almost 11 years ago

    Ok Measurement in decimetres is fine. I can handle that as long as everyone doesn’t know what Im talking about. Actually going metric with weight would be measuring in newtons and a rough estimate is 1 pound = 4 newtons.Kilograms is mass and there is a difference. But since the bigger the mass the bigger the weight…. its all moot

     •  Reply
  13. Bassethound abernathy
    boldyuma  almost 11 years ago

    Too heck with the pounds..I want to know how manyhorsepower I put out….or Mega Joules or Kilo Watts..woof!

     •  Reply
  14. Jp steve x
    JP Steve Premium Member almost 11 years ago

    I’ve converted to the firkins per furlong per fortnight system!

     •  Reply
  15. Photo tiger
    tigerchik32  almost 11 years ago

    Now why didn’t I think of that!

     •  Reply
  16. Missing large
    Jobecur  almost 11 years ago

    @ crcesc“size tent-and-a-half!”. That’s so hilarious, I may just have to use it myself!

     •  Reply
  17. Dscn7190 small
    stuart  almost 11 years ago

    Lbs are a measure of force, and kilograms are a measure of mass. They are not convertible. People try to pretend they are by applying a nominal acceleration to the mass, and converting the resulting force. However, the conversion factor varies with altitude and geographic location.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Shoe