Mike Luckovich for January 11, 2013

  1. 69a2f960 2132 4569 a8f7 3d56dd1b2cda
    WineStar Premium Member over 11 years ago

    As Deep Throat said to the FBI agents, “Follow the money.”

     •  Reply
  2. Dgp 61
    DavidGBA  over 11 years ago

    Gotta be some gun manufacturer money in the NRA coffers, too! Having an African-American president has sold so many guns, much ammo, to paranoid fools.

     •  Reply
  3. Missing large
    Marty Z  over 11 years ago

    JoeCool, regarding Obama’s "Marxist/socialist indoctrination…opposed to the economic capitalism…is anti-business, anti-capitalism, pro-socialism…*Seems like you want to take Darwinism to the extreme, and that you want goverment to do the same.

     •  Reply
  4. Cumbres toltec steam engine   tiny
    jimguess  over 11 years ago

    Has ANYONE on the left EVER read the Constitution? Has ANYONE on the left EVER read the Second Amendment?

    Obviously, Luckovich has not … or refuses to accept it.

    Wait until some lowlife breaks into HIS home, robs him, rapes his wife, and beats him senseless. THEN, what will Mike wish he had in the home and training how to use it before that thug broke in???

    A GUN, stupid! A GUN!

     •  Reply
  5. Cumbres toltec steam engine   tiny
    jimguess  over 11 years ago

    Again, Omnius, YOU are totally clueless. Where concealed carry is legal, crime is DOWN!!! But, of course, you don’t want to know that.

    Oh, by the way, show me ONE murder, rape, assault, robbery, etc, at a GUN SHOW! There have been NONE!

    And, you conveniently forget … practically every day someone LEGALLY owning a gun defends themselves from a thug who got theirs illegally.

    But does the lamestream media report that? Of course not! They want to disarm ALL private citizens.

    And, guess what? When private citizens don’t have guns, only the CRIMINALS will have guns!

    Then who will protect YOUR sorry A$$!!!

     •  Reply
  6. Cumbres toltec steam engine   tiny
    jimguess  over 11 years ago
    … sigh … what a bunch of idiots …
     •  Reply
  7. Bill   don
    derlehrer  over 11 years ago

    The guns in mexico are supplied by the US government under the Obama admin.

    And those that aren’t are smuggled in from venezuala-———————————-Having lived in Mexico for more than six years, I can tell you that these two sources are not the only ones..For example, some of the police (with their “legal” weapons that come mainly from the United States) have defected to drug gangs. They also have grenades at their disposal..The point is, the criminal element has no respect for law – they will do whatever they want, regardless..And this is true regardless of governmental authority, location or attempts to disarm the criminals. Why would any sane person think that passing restrictive gun laws will cut down on criminal violence?

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    hippogriff  over 11 years ago

    jcmckain: It was to a Washington Post reporter, who, with his partner, was doing a better job than the FBI had ever done..Jim Guess: Haven’t you read Madison’s Notes on the Constitutional Convention? The Second Amendment was an addition to all those references to the militias in the Constitution – how to “provide for the common defense” without such evils as mercenaries, standing armies, or conscription which experience had showed them were the basis of a military dictatorship and/or imperial ambitions.

     •  Reply
  9. Madmen icon
    McSpook  over 11 years ago

    Wow, are you a delusional paranoid racist POS. Maybe we should make a point to lock up the crazies; please be so kind as to pack your toothbrush and jammies and wait by the curb for the “Looney-toons Bus.”

     •  Reply
  10. Bill   don
    derlehrer  over 11 years ago

    To follow your apparent logic I never would have opened my business. Because some people will never be satisfied with the work I perform I should just give up and not serve the many who value my efforts.-————————————————This is a perfect example of non sequitur argumentation. The conclusion would only apply if you might be engaged in some illegal activity, you see?.If I can make an attempt to explain, the legislature might be able to pass laws that prohibit “assault rifles” and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. All law-abiding citizens will comply. Criminals will not. There is no compulsion that will force the criminal element to give up their “strength” – so the laws are ineffectual. This lesson should have been learned with the last attempt at “regulation” during Clinton’s term..So, I must ask: What use will these suggested limitations be? What effect do you imagine will these proposals provide?

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Mike Luckovich