Assuming the Bidens are guilty as hell, how does that absolve The Tramp?
I didn’t even see “quakes”; I saw “quacks.” That might be because I read the original article. :)
I had to look twice to see that she’s lying on the cat’s lap. (Then it made sense.)
I keep tweeting to him that John McCain was keeping him honest, and continue asking him what threat the Tramp used to turn him around. Odd, he doesn’t reply.
It seems to be along the same line as the interview I saw recently concerning a group of female supporters of the Tramp. One of them stated, “Well, they all do it.” (I think that’s what the cartoon suggests.)
Interviewer: “I don’t have any evidence of that.”
Interviewee: “I don’t either.”
Interviewer: “So you’re just saying that because you want to believe it?”
Surely you’re not suggesting the whistleblower is a Ukranian?
Steve is trying to make a dime from depicting what Tramp’s cadre want to believe. You can’t know what’s actually in his head. Compare it to Senator Linda Graham, who abandoned all his previous logical criticisms and then joined Cult 45 for personal gain.
I like the interpretation given by some of the late-night comics: “I heard him say it!” That makes it “hearsay”! LOL
I don’t know why the discussion about “hearsay” is still relevant; there was testimony from many who had first-hand knowledge of the “quid pro quo” (bribery)!
Add to that the fact that there are plenty of ’NO DEPOSIT – NO RETURN" beer bottles. :)