Tom Toles by Tom Toles

Tom Toles

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, almost 3 years ago

    Thanks Daddy Government for telling me what light bulbs I have to buy. Cars too!
    What’s next, telling us we have to buy health insurance?

  2. omQ R

    omQ R said, almost 3 years ago


    …or environmental regulations. Because if I wanted clean air, I’d just bloviate harder.

  3. Subversive

    Subversive said, almost 3 years ago

    Ironic how the biggest pigs just don’t like those “pigtail” bulbs.

  4. Gary McSpook

    Gary McSpook said, almost 3 years ago

    Ahh yes, the Republicans, clouding over even the brightest sky.
    The party of “no.”
    As inspiring as a log jam.
    Unhappy people making tragically poor decisions.
    Where intellectual curiosity has gone the same way as concern for the poor and disadvantaged..
    Why is it that we don’t all aspire to be just like them?

  5. Ryan (Say what now‽)

    Ryan (Say what now‽) GoComics PRO Member said, almost 3 years ago

    I consider myself somewhat of an environmentalist, but I don’t like those pig tail bulbs because of the mercury they contain.

  6. cdward

    cdward said, almost 3 years ago


    Since corporations generally try to s-c-r-e-w us at every opportunity, I prefer having lots of government regulation. And if it weren’t for Republicans, the government wouldn’t tell us to buy health insurance – it would provide it to everyone so that small business owners wouldn’t have to worry about losing their businesses just because they get sick. Nut the very rich, who benefit most from governmental assistance, don’t like the idea that any of their hard-stolen money should actually work to make a better society.

  7. Doughfoot

    Doughfoot said, almost 3 years ago

    If an individual, with intent, did what “Freedom Enterprises” did to a state’s water supply, he would be called a terrorist, and go to jail.
    If a flesh-and-blood person did it by accident, it still might get pretty bad for him.
    But when the responsible “person” is a corporation, what happens? You think the controlling stockholders, or directors, are going to be ruined by this? Or only those with no real control over how the company operates: some low-level technician scapegoat, shareholders who will lose a bit of their investment, customers who will see their costs rise a bit, an insurance company have to pay out some damages, maybe. I don’t know.

    My question is, where is the hue and cry from the party of “personal responsibility”? More than a century ago, Ambrose Bierce defined a corporation as an ingenious device for accruing individual profit while avoiding individual responsibility.

    I’d be willing to try an experiment: we’ll eliminate all laws by which the government regulate business including those make possible that “ingenious device” the corporation. Every enterprise will have to owned by one or several actual persons who will be regarded as equal partners, and fully liable, “personally responsible” financially, legally, and morally, for the full consequences of everything their business does. If they screw up, they all lose everything and go to jail. Anybody in the “personal responsibility” camp, the “small government” camp want to sign up for that program?

  8. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, almost 3 years ago

    I have a right to flammable clothing. How DARE the government mandate that those products can’t be sold? What gives them the right?

  9. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, almost 3 years ago

    “Passion over enlightenment”

  10. Larry

    Larry said, almost 3 years ago

    Choose LEDs.

  11. Enoki

    Enoki said, almost 3 years ago

    Given the “Polar Vortex” that is probably a good thing…

  12. Christopher Shea

    Christopher Shea said, almost 3 years ago

    Everyone who howls about more efficient light bulbs should also go ahead and trade their cell in for a candlestick phone and their car for a Model T.

  13. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 said, almost 3 years ago

    “In the winter heat is a welcome by-product of light.”

    If you think the inefficiency of incandescent bulbs is a cheap way to add heat to your house, you might want to review your electric bill.

  14. wbr

    wbr said, almost 3 years ago

    mercury is better for you than co2 [per epa]

  15. Enoki

    Enoki said, almost 3 years ago

    I know about the Polar Vortex David. As for “…carbon footprints…” I can accept we need to change how we produce energy. We should be striving to do that first and foremost as cheaply as possible. If reducing carbon is the goal as well then the clear and overwhelmingly cheapest means to achieve that goal is to switch to nuclear on a massive scale and then use the cheap electricity produced to switch our portable fuel for things like vehicles to hydrogen and the fuel cell.
    That makes for a tiny carbon footprint unlike the massive one that remains from solar and wind which will NEVER become dispatchable base load sources because of their unreliable output.
    The incandescent light bulb in that scenario is an irrelevancy as is switching to CFLs or LEDs.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).