Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Comments (35) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, almost 4 years ago

    mikeonthemic: “Treason consists of levying war against the United States or giving aid to its enemies.” You sir, are a traitor. Turn yourself in.

  2. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 4 years ago

    The constitution states that the purpose of militias is to suppress insurrection. Not cause insurrection, suppress insurrection. There are a lot of idiots, like mike above, who seem unable to read any part of the constitution except the second half of the second amendment.

  3. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, almost 4 years ago

    antiquetracman: You are confusing it with the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution was because the Articles of Confederation were so mucked up with states’ rights that the country wouldn’t work.

  4. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Lalo has it absolutely RIGHT, CORRECT, AND confirmed in the language of the Constitution, including and especially, the Second Amendment. Taking up arms against our government is simply ONE THNIG, treason, and the only Capital crime identified there.

  5. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago


    So what’s the difference between treason and sedition? I’m thinking the latter is fomenting acts of rebellion. Hmmm…

  6. druber61

    druber61 said, almost 4 years ago

    Good strip, thanks.

  7. PianoGuy24

    PianoGuy24 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    And if the minutemen wasn’t as well armed as the British we’d still be a part of England.


    JAMES HICKMAN GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Spot on Lalo. Keep on keepin on

  9. brimhir

    brimhir said, almost 4 years ago

    A bunch of Iraqis are pretty much doing that now. How long has the US military been over there, and they are still meeting armed resistance? Add to that the reluctance of some of our military to fire upon their own people and you might find that even a semi-well regulated militia could “take on” a seal team. If this were not the case, there would be peace in the Middle East. There is a difference between conquering a people and destroying them entirely. The US government would not issue orders to destroy the country, therefore, the entire might of the US Armed Forces would not be utilized. There… done with rant.

  10. pdchapin

    pdchapin said, almost 4 years ago

    The 2nd amendment is there because the British tried to seize the arms of the local MA militia, the event that started the revolution. Most of the amendments can be directly linked to British abuses. It’s the reason there’s a ban on quartering soldiers in private homes in peace time.

    The 2nd amendment is the only one that feels required to justify itself.

  11. pdchapin

    pdchapin said, almost 4 years ago

    It should also be pointed out that no modern industrial government has ever been overthrown by a internal, popular uprising. The assets available to the government are so massive, and the risks to the average citizen are so great, that it wouldn’t even be close.

  12. Larry

    Larry said, almost 4 years ago


    But wouldn’t the Minutemen have been using British and French arms?

  13. Mary Sullivan

    Mary Sullivan GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Not to “fight” but to protect oneself & one’s property.

  14. apfelzra

    apfelzra GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago


    Maybe, except for the Britons’ 3000 mile supply line back to England, and the enmity between most colonists and the redcoats, and the help of the French, who bankrupted themselves to help us . . .

  15. Kylop

    Kylop said, almost 4 years ago

    Morty, for separating the “crazies” from the lawful gun owners….that seems to be where the “fix the broken mental health system” argument goes. When I think about that it brings up questions of “How is that going to be paid for?”, “Does that mean every American now has to get an annual psych exam?”, What happens when Dr X asks one of the questions you listed and decides Mr Y isn’t fit to own a gun? Does there have to be a 2nd opinion?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (20).