John Deering by John Deering

John Deering

Comments (14) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 2 years ago

    I get the WMD reference, but what is with all of the ridicule of someone taking up the hobby of painting? Maybe he isn’t a good artist. So what? The subject is inane.

  2. ODon

    ODon said, over 2 years ago

    Good ’toon.

  3. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 2 years ago

    Be better if they’d both stuck to painting.
    Support the Arts, people! Avoid World War 3!

  4. echoraven

    echoraven said, over 2 years ago

    She dodged a shoe! That has to account for something!

  5. dzw3030

    dzw3030 said, over 2 years ago

    I’m disappointed in Deering stooping to personal invective. It is sophomoric at best and has no humor, just stupid.

  6. pirate227

    pirate227 said, over 2 years ago

    Truth hurts.

  7. Zin Rosenblum

    Zin Rosenblum said, over 2 years ago

    Pies and shoes being thrown at humble public servants

  8. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Oh, I feel so much better about having spent trillions of money (on credit) and wasted so many lives on the BUsh/Cheney adventures… and once again, you love to quote wing-nut sources to justify the criminal or reprehensible behavior of your conservative nihilists. Quoting stats are fun, and so easy to twist to make them mean what you want. The Doc. Center for Human Rights in Iraq currently distributes no information to the U.S. public, is based somewhere in the Middle East and has a useless Web site. Saddam was a nasty person and killed a lot of people – and now we have trillions in debt, hundreds of thosands killed, Iraq a client state of Iran, and more crap to come.
    Go ahead. Tell me again what a good thing it was to do that.

  9. dzw3030

    dzw3030 said, over 2 years ago

    “look at the technology they created in the process.” Yeah, they stimulated production of modern gasses, gold recovery… inventive little devils…

  10. Gypsy8

    Gypsy8 said, over 2 years ago

    Great – one more reason found in 2014 why invading Iraq in 2003 was a good decision. Now, only a dozen or so more suspected tyrants to invade and depose.

  11. Gypsy8

    Gypsy8 said, over 2 years ago

    But Neo, despite your vast wealth, influence, and power things don’t always turn out properly. You had to be disgusted that after the invasion costing trillions and thousands of lives, when the oil contracts were let out it was the Asians and the Europeans that were the big winners, particularly Russia and China and they weren’t even part of the coalition of the willing. Your cronies got crumbs. You had to be heart broken.

  12. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    My original search brought up a different site, but I see where Stanford cited it’s info. Mea culpa – not a wing-nut source.
    However, their mayhem, violence, and torture is not directed by one tyrant, but by anyone, anywhere, in the anarchy “your Messiah” unleashed and ignored.
    Grasp defeat from the jaws of victory? What an obscene claim. Oh wait, that’s right – “It’s Obama’s Fault”.

  13. JimmyM01

    JimmyM01 said, over 2 years ago

    Bill Clinton speaking in 1998:
    ‘If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons-of-mass-destruction program."

    Clintion’s Secretary of State Madeline Albright, also speaking in 1998:

    “Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”

    Sandy Berger, Clinton’s National Security Adviser:
    “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”

    Nancy Pelosi as a member of the House Intelligence Committee she had access to all of the same data and reports that Bush did.:
    “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons-of-mass-destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”

    Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton speaking in October 2002:
    “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members.”
    So, please tell me again who lied?

  14. rossevrymn

    rossevrymn GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Don’t you love it when virtually every liberal cartoonist does the same piece? No, they’re not lazy and unimaginative.

  15. Refresh Comments.