Great – one more reason found in 2014 why invading Iraq in 2003 was a good decision. Now, only a dozen or so more suspected tyrants to invade and depose.
But Neo, despite your vast wealth, influence, and power things don’t always turn out properly. You had to be disgusted that after the invasion costing trillions and thousands of lives, when the oil contracts were let out it was the Asians and the Europeans that were the big winners, particularly Russia and China and they weren’t even part of the coalition of the willing. Your cronies got crumbs. You had to be heart broken.
Bill Clinton speaking in 1998: ‘If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons-of-mass-destruction program."
Clintion’s Secretary of State Madeline Albright, also speaking in 1998:
“Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
Sandy Berger, Clinton’s National Security Adviser:“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
Nancy Pelosi as a member of the House Intelligence Committee she had access to all of the same data and reports that Bush did.:“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons-of-mass-destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton speaking in October 2002: “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members.”So, please tell me again who lied?
Odon Premium Member about 10 years ago
Good ’toon.
ossiningaling about 10 years ago
Be better if they’d both stuck to painting. Support the Arts, people! Avoid World War 3!
echoraven about 10 years ago
She dodged a shoe! That has to account for something!
dzw3030 about 10 years ago
I’m disappointed in Deering stooping to personal invective. It is sophomoric at best and has no humor, just stupid.
pirate227 about 10 years ago
Truth hurts.
Zen-of-Zinfandel about 10 years ago
Pies and shoes being thrown at humble public servants
dzw3030 about 10 years ago
“look at the technology they created in the process.” Yeah, they stimulated production of modern gasses, gold recovery… inventive little devils…
Gypsy8 about 10 years ago
Great – one more reason found in 2014 why invading Iraq in 2003 was a good decision. Now, only a dozen or so more suspected tyrants to invade and depose.
Gypsy8 about 10 years ago
But Neo, despite your vast wealth, influence, and power things don’t always turn out properly. You had to be disgusted that after the invasion costing trillions and thousands of lives, when the oil contracts were let out it was the Asians and the Europeans that were the big winners, particularly Russia and China and they weren’t even part of the coalition of the willing. Your cronies got crumbs. You had to be heart broken.
JimmyM01 about 10 years ago
Bill Clinton speaking in 1998: ‘If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons-of-mass-destruction program."
Clintion’s Secretary of State Madeline Albright, also speaking in 1998:“Iraq is a long way from [the USA], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
Sandy Berger, Clinton’s National Security Adviser:“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
Nancy Pelosi as a member of the House Intelligence Committee she had access to all of the same data and reports that Bush did.:“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons-of-mass-destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton speaking in October 2002: “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical- and biological-weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members.”So, please tell me again who lied?
rossevrymn about 10 years ago
Don’t you love it when virtually every liberal cartoonist does the same piece? No, they’re not lazy and unimaginative.