John Deering by John Deering

John Deering

Comments (18) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. DGF999

    DGF999 said, 1 day ago

    That sounds like something an idiotic politician would say. Just send the troops in and let them do their jobs without interference from dumbass politicians, and we’ll win the battles.

  2. Larry

    Larry said, 1 day ago

    We will not win over there as long as “holy men” are leading their countries.
    Will tanks ever conquer religion?

  3. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, 1 day ago

    Ain’t boots already ON the ground?
    -
    This is RepubliCons wanting MORE boots on the ground, MORE war, MORE spending. RepubliCons can’t support infrastructure, education, health, or human services spending, but WAR?? Hey, let’s have more of THAT kind of stimulus.

  4. charlie555

    charlie555 said, 1 day ago

    How can a nation that is afraid to discipline their children discipline the world?

  5. retpost

    retpost said, 1 day ago

    Ask a republican what boots on the ground means?

  6. denis1112

    denis1112 said, about 23 hours ago

    @wmconelly

    You aren’t really following this story are you?
    Bill Clinton did not take Osama into custody when he was offered by other governments two different times.Nor did he allow the CIA to kill him when they had the chance.
    If he had it is possible there would have been no 9/11.
    Then no invasions.
    Saddam would have been dealt with some other time or way.
    The Taliban would still be enslaving women in Afghanistan.

  7. denis1112

    denis1112 said, about 23 hours ago

    @retpost

    Ask a democrat if they served.

  8. MangeyMoose

    MangeyMoose GoComics PRO Member said, about 22 hours ago

    @Larry

    Good post! And probably very accurate!

  9. TripleAxel

    TripleAxel said, about 21 hours ago

    We tried to control Libya without boots on the ground with similar results.

  10. r2varney

    r2varney said, about 18 hours ago

    You will notice that for the most part.. those with the power to put boots on the ground are the same ones that deferred when they had the chance to put their boots on the ground.
    There should be a rule..no promoting war (or voting for) if your children or grand children’s boots are not in the front line

  11. disgustedamerican

    disgustedamerican said, about 16 hours ago

    With Islamic State swallowing Iraq, thanks to Obama removing troops and ignoring the Bush “standing troops” plan after the normal pullout, why is Obama sending more Boots on the Ground to fight ebola in Africa???
    -
    (how does the military forces “conquer” an illness?
    )

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 16 hours ago

    ^Disgusted: with support for local governments with medical and MP units, they can do a lot more good in Africa, than Iraq and Syria. ISIL hasn’t hardly swallowed Iraq, but if we could just keep the 300,000 or so in the Iraqi Army to stand up, instead of pretend they’re French, it would help a lot.

  13. Jase99

    Jase99 said, about 15 hours ago

    @charlie555

    “How can a nation that is afraid to discipline their children discipline the world?”

    I wholeheartedly agree. The day you can’t discipline your kids by leaving lacerations on their behind and tender parts and stuff leaves into their mouths, the terrorist have truly won!!

  14. Jase99

    Jase99 said, about 15 hours ago

    @denis1112

    “Ask a democrat if they served.”

    Or George W Bush, Dick Cheney, or any of the Republican chicken hawks.

    Fun fact: John Boehner was discharged from the Navy eight weeks after joining due to a “bad back.”

  15. Noreen Klose

    Noreen Klose said, about 13 hours ago

    @charlie555

    Good one!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (3).