Jim Morin by Jim Morin

Jim Morin


Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Ransom D Stone

    Ransom D Stone said, 11 months ago

    Good one!

  2. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 11 months ago

    Yep, the old, childish “but Johnny did the same thing” excuse. Try using that line when the IRS comes knocking.

  3. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    When is that orange skinned guy going to jail for not doing his job?

  4. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Do Liberals watch NBC News?
    Answer: No!
    Proof: If they did, then Morin would now that Obama said this was wrong and Obama is looking to possibly press criminal charges.

  5. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago


    When Harry Reid goes to jail for not allowing The Senate to read and vote on bills passed by The House

  6. mikefive

    mikefive said, 11 months ago


    Not quite true, gendotte. It isn’t the “same” questions asked of all c(4) applicants that are significant. It’s the additional questions.

  7. rossevrymn

    rossevrymn said, 11 months ago

    Rogue spinning, so far no other liberal cartoonist has made this play.

  8. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago


    gendotte said, about 4 hours ago
    Funny thing, though. They asked the same questions of ALL 501cs"
    They ask all of them about their personal facebook pages?
    Sorry you fail

  9. Sharuniboy

    Sharuniboy GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    In theory, the exemption under 501c4 comes to a non-profit, not identified as a “religious body”, for the NON-POLITICAL “benefits” such group has to offer.

    The Tea Party as such – and its “subordinates” by any name – IS a “Political Party” – or at least claims to be one. And, insofar as non-political “benefits” to offer be concerned, it – and its “subordinates” by any name – has NOTHING to offer anyone. So, the basic question is clear. WHY does the Tea Party – or any “subordinate” thereof – even seek Tax Exemption?

    The IRS is absolutely RIGHT in questioning the application(s); and seeking PROOF that there be those “non-political” actions and “benefits” claimed as reason(s) for being exempt.
    As to asking about “personal Facebook pages”: Yes, of course! Are the Officers – and Members – of the organization applying for Tax Exemption intending to use ANY PART of the organization’s funds for “direct political action”, in contravention of long established IRS rules against such? And, then, how “personal” are those pages? Or, are they “personal” at all? All legitimate questions of anyone and everyone seeking Tax Exemption – especially under 501c4.

    You don’t just apply, and DEMAND. You qualify, or you DON’T.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 11 months ago

    Such short memories.

    When Bush was in the White House, we were either with him or we were terrorists. He was keeping us safe. That’s the difference.

    Sheesh. Sometimes I wonder about you people.

  11. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, 11 months ago

    I don’t recall any investigations of the MULTIPLE creeps who suggested Bush be killed…

  12. Dr Lou

    Dr Lou GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    About time… I have been most fascinated and disappointed how many otherwise reasonably astute cartoonists have simply pigged onto the GOP’s delusion; for instance, that the IRS debacle is even remotely similar to Watergate since both parties have their share of stupidity and political excess that, while vile, is hardly criminal. Watergate, however, was purely criminal. Thanks, Jim…for even a touch of reality.

  13. Mhic Dhu Ghaill

    Mhic Dhu Ghaill GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago


    IRS likes me. I only take the standard deduction.

  14. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 11 months ago

    Go to “Reagan Admnistration Scandals” at wikipedia and note the indictments, and CONVCTIONS, even though GHW Bush pardoned many of them.

    One of my favorites was James Watt (“super twit”) who got the lab contract to do all the drug testing of federal employees, even though his company had NO LABORATORY FACILITIES! That was just one of Watt’s insanities, like “use up all our natural resources immediately and take the money because Jesus is coming back, soon.” BTW: I was in on the suit that went to the SCOTUS and we won that time around, and prohibited the government from doing “random drug testing” without probable. There was an exception of pilots and a few other critical jobs where a “first offense without prior history or P.C.” COULD get people killed.

  15. pirate227

    pirate227 said, 11 months ago


  16. Load the rest of the comments (4).