Jack Ohman by Jack Ohman

Jack OhmanNo Zoom

Comments (11) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    For a change, the one on the right is correct, and has the only authority.

  2. myming

    myming said, over 5 years ago

    good idea - move the white house to arizona…

  3. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 5 years ago

    ^ I suggest the move be to Nogales. Would border security become a priority?

  4. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, over 5 years ago

    ^Instead of cocooning the U.S. with concrete, why not do two effective and cost cutting measures?

    One: Mandate the use of e-verify and have the employees verify their migration status in the country.

    Two: Decriminalize pot. You know? The same way we decriminalized booze and got rid of Al Capone.

    But that would require big government and we don’t want that.

    BTW Bruce HA!

  5. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 5 years ago

    WC, you need to wait for the final decision. The one SCOTUS will issue. Then, if it remains the same, I will concede your point.

    Oh, by the way, Those two things would be great. But hy would that require “big government”? E-verify is available BUT the government doesn’t “enforce” their own law. Decriminalize Pot would mean less government not more.

  6. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    We need to look at who actually CUT budgets for enforcment over several decades on the federal side. Yes, we need to stop illegal activities— it is time to realize “Just say NO to ‘just say no’” with regard to several issues.

    We need to let the Bush tax cuts die- then enforce federal laws on immigration (with more $$), crack down on illegal drug sales- by modifying our “drug” laws to apply to real drugs, and get treatment instead of incarceration for users, and big sentences for sellers- including the big drug manufacturers who are “legitimate” but manufacture far more of some of these “illicit” drugs on the market than legally prescribed.

    Drug enforcement needs to be Cheney’s management base, start at the very top, and work your way down, with only those at the top being nailed first.

  7. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, over 5 years ago

    That we do Bruce. Wait for the final decision that is!

    E-Verify is available, but its not mandated. Why shouldn’t we get big government involved? After all, we enforce big, expensive, draconian, intrusive government on gays, women, and minorities. Why should employers be any different?

    Actually it would mean more government if pot is legalized. The government would then have to set rules on how much a person can buy, if they can drive while intoxicated, taxes on the product, who’s allowed to sell it, etc.

  8. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 5 years ago

    WC LOL yeah wait ……. Oh I agree and if the employers don’t comply then fine them out of existence. And the pot situation could be handed over to ATF and other than the study to find out the average limit (personally I do not drive if I have had even a small amount of an intoxicant - I’m a designated driver at all times), the current people in treasury can figure out the tax code (it should already be there since the infraction for pot use is a tax issue) so no increase in government.

  9. pirate227

    pirate227 said, over 5 years ago

    All of you fiscal conservatives, how is AZ going to fund their new mandate on local law enforcement?

    Oh, I know, tax cuts for the rich!


  10. W(ar).Crime

    W(ar).Crime said, over 5 years ago

    ^^Now you’re being sarcastic.

  11. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 5 years ago

    ^Maybe a tad bit…………………….. ;0))

  12. Refresh Comments.