Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. wolfhoundblues1

    wolfhoundblues1 said, about 2 years ago

    I loved their press conferences the other day. Both Jay and Eric sat there and said that they know nothing, but are holding a press conference to say as much.

  2. Nos Nevets

    Nos Nevets said, about 2 years ago

    Deliberate ignorance.
    A willful, positive act.
    “Sin Of Commission”,
    not a “Sin of Omission”.

  3. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 2 years ago

    Why did these professing incompetents seek office?
    -
    Obama, Hillary, Holder, all the Obama cabinet officials, apparently think Americans are too stupid to really hold them accountable for poor judgment & lack of principles in choosing to politicize even deaths they cause by negligence.
    And when Congress tries to do its duty to oversee the executive (a constitutional requirement), predictable replies:
    “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” or “It is GW Bush’s fault.”

  4. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 2 years ago

    If they know nothing how can they lead?

  5. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    So you are saying that your man was okay then? Please they are politicians. Think of them all that way and you might not step on your own feet in condemning one side while letting the other party get off free.

  6. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @Harleyquinn

    Saul Alinsky was all about the underdog. Not about party affiliation or political points-of-view.

  7. hanmari

    hanmari said, about 2 years ago

    Credibility and Accountability from Mr. Obama? Never! The man leads by disinformation and expects his underlings and cronies to do the same. He has planted the seeds of corruption in our current government, and is harvesting what he has sown.

  8. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @Harleyquinn

    Newt Gingrich’s 1995 memo to the Republican political action committee, called GOPAC, “Language: A Key Mechanism of Control,” which taught conservatives to use sharp and negative words and exaggerations to describe Democrats and positive expressions for Republicans. And Gingrich lectured in training sessions on how to use “shield issues,” such as abortion, same sex unions, gay rights and immigration issues to disguise the Republican agenda while putting Democrats on the defensive.

    Consider the downright maliciousness of the Republicans towards women going through a crisis of an unwanted or dangerous pregnancy.
    .
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/saul-friedman/american-political-tradit_b_586018.html

  9. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    I find it interesting that so many “conservative” ’toonists and commentators are the ones pulling up Nixon as a comparison, when REAGAN had just as many (more in fact) folks indicted, convicted, and yes pardoned by Bush, for criminal activity! Then take into account all the pack of lies and incompetence of the “W” administration leading to 9/11, then on to Afghanistan, wrong turn to Iraq, and thousands of deaths, and trillions of dollars down the drain!


    Amazing all the insulting names for Obama that flow from pure hatred, and folks that couldn’t see the real liars and crooks when they were being bitten on the butt by them!

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 2 years ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    Please tell me how unhappy you were when Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney refused to testify under oath (there’s only one reason why), when Mr. Bush wouldn’t talk without Mr. Cheney in the room, and Mr. Gonzalez couldn’t remember ANYTHING when asked about multiple subjects.

    I am not blaming Bush. I’m saying that it’s all too common to complain now about stuff that has happened all too often in the past. Why were we so willing to accept it in the past administration?

    And I also believe that “Americans are too stupid to really hold them accountable”, because our history teaches us this. Both parties know it, and both parties count on it. Ignore it at your peril.

    By the way, who was cuter: Ginger or Mary Ann? And what are the Kardashians up to? Who got kicked off the island? Inquiring minds want to know.

  11. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 2 years ago

    @Rad-ish

    Yes Newt was the first Republican to emulate sal alansky.

  12. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 2 years ago

    Night-Gaunt49 said, about 4 hours ago
    @Harleyquinn
    “Saul Alinsky was all about the underdog. Not about party affiliation or political points-of-view.”
    -
    N-G, that is the laugh of the day in this cartoon’s postings.
    Saul Alinsky’s teachings are the foundation of the ABYSS in Congress and between the R’s and D’s. Obama is a disciple of Alinsky and he publicly “complains” about that abyss he helped create, for the “gridlock” and opposition to his remaking of the USA.
    -
    Alinsky’s “community organizing” was step one in his Class Warfare (thanks to Karl Marx) and he taught his “organizers” to #1 find a common enemy; #2 organize to overthrow that enemy and #3 make a synthesis new government to fit your radical ideas.
    -
    Are you, N-G, gullible or a “mole” for overthrowing the constitutional system of American government?

  13. Quipss

    Quipss said, about 2 years ago

    Al Obama

    Al = Te

    The Obama, so I take it you are schooled that the world drops off before 60w and after 180w heading west.

  14. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    “Curiosity and irreverence go together. Curiosity cannot exist without the other. Curiosity asks, “Is this true?” “Just because this has always been the way, is the best or right way of life, the best or right religion, political or economic value, morality?” To the questioner, nothing is sacred. He detests dogma, defies any finite definition of morality, rebels against any repression of a free, open search of ideas no matter where they may lead. He is challenging, insulting, agitating, discrediting. He stirs unrest.”
    ― Saul D. Alinsky January 30, 1909 – June 12, 1972, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals

  15. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Was he writing in favor of it or against it? From you reaction you attribute he was writing in favor of it. I get no such attribution. Care to give more information and where you obtained it?

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).