Gary Varvel by Gary Varvel

Gary Varvel

Recommended

Comments (39) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 1 year ago

    At least Obama has a jobs plan. Romney says he has a plan, but there isn’t actually one other than Hope and cut taxes. He doesn’t even have a plan to pay for his 20% across-the-board tax cut. Is it raising taxes on the workers, or adding to the debt? It’s got to be one or the other. Romney? Anyone?

  2. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, over 1 year ago

    @ARodney

    If Obama had a plan, shouldn’t he have used it by now? Promises from him don’t cut it. He’s a liar. Notice I didn’t say he has lied – he is by nature a liar.

    Even if Romney were to add to the debt, he can’t add as much as Obama has. Anyway, he can always blame Obama for the next four years.

    And it’s cut tax rates, not cut tax revenue. There’s a difference, sort of like the difference between profit and profit margin. Not that I expect you to understand.

  3. John Orr

    John Orr said, over 1 year ago

    Romney has said his tax cuts will be ‘revenue neutral’. So what’s the point? It will be revenue neutral because he wants to gut social programs like a slaughtered pig. Another give-away to the super-rich at the expense of the lower classes.

  4. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, over 1 year ago

    @John Orr

    “Another give-away to the super-rich at the expense of the lower classes.”

    Clueless. Romney’s plan raises taxes on the people you hate. Obama’s way (not a plan) raises them on the people he says he loves.

  5. indieme

    indieme GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Robme got $15 to $115 MILLION from the auto bailout. His biggest donor made over $2 BILLION from the bailout. They closed 25 of the 26 Delco (Delphi) plants and shipped them to China. 25,000 UAW workers lost their jobs. Is that why he doesn’t want us to see his 2009 tax returns?

  6. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @ionizer
    I do understand the difference between tax rates and tax revenues. I still don’t see where Romney’s going to pay for his tax cuts, simply because he won’t say. Ryan maintains it’s revenue-neutral. When asked how by Chris Wallace on Fox, he stated it was revenue-neutral. I’m sure we can trust him…..

    Speaking of liars….how about Ryan’s under-3-hour time in a marathon? I know it shouldn’t matter. So why would he lie about it? Maybe because a liar is so used to lying that he lies when there is no penalty for telling the truth.

    And let’s assume that Romney’s plan is revenue-neutral. This still leaves us with $16 trillion in debt. With interest, this will grow. So, even if it’s revenue-neutral, it has no value.

  7. NeoconMan

    NeoconMan said, over 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    Yes, it’s revenue neutral. But you’ll have to elect us to find out how.


    In the meantime, trust us.

  8. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 1 year ago

    @Ionizer

    Romney wants to cut tax rates which cuts revenue.

  9. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, over 1 year ago

    @Ionizer

    So lowering from 35% to 25% is adding in your mind?

  10. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, over 1 year ago

    @I Play One On TV

    “And let’s assume that Romney’s plan is revenue-neutral. This still leaves us with $16 trillion in debt. With interest, this will grow. So, even if it’s revenue-neutral, it has no value.”

    And Obama will dig us even deeper into the hole.

  11. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, over 1 year ago

    @NeoconMan

    “Yes, it’s revenue neutral. But you’ll have to elect us to find out how.

    In the meantime, trust us."

    Are you channeling Pelosi now?

  12. Ionizer

    Ionizer said, over 1 year ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    “Romney wants to cut tax rates which cuts revenue.”

    If you remove some loopholes for the people Obama hates, no. If we fall off the cliff, everyone loses, but Obama’s more interested in getting his way. A paccie would be cheaper.

  13. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    “Revenue neutral” is code for the debt will continue to grow, and U.S. jobs will continue to go overseas as the “Bain bunch” continue to profit, untaxed.

  14. Jimathai

    Jimathai GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    The sure fire way for Obama to win is to endorse Mitt Romney. Then all of the GOP and TEA Party would predictably say no and do the opposite.

  15. Jimathai

    Jimathai GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    That binder is a lot thinner since Obama took over.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (24).