Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau


Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Bruno Zeigerts

    Bruno Zeigerts said, about 3 years ago

    My invitations must have been lost in the mail.

  2. Arye Uygur

    Arye Uygur said, about 3 years ago

    To make it current, just substitute “baptism” for “wedding.”

  3. Alabama_Al

    Alabama_Al said, about 3 years ago

    Sam’s still wide-eyed – this flashback is old.

  4. Astolat

    Astolat said, about 3 years ago


    2011 – as per the copyright message between the first two panels, and the date of the Cambridges’ wedding…

  5. Rasslebear

    Rasslebear said, about 3 years ago

    is he ever going to get back to new strips?

  6. Astolat

    Astolat said, about 3 years ago


    I swear you’re all registering new handles just to wind us up. There’s a forum somewhere where you all divvy up the days for who’s going to ask about reruns, isn’t there…?

    My post from the very top of last Friday’s comments:

    Yes, it’s a rerun, only Sundays’ are new. Sometime mid-November. For further details see comments passim ad nauseam, or google it. Please don’t ask, we’re sick to death of answering.

  7. missanyssa

    missanyssa said, about 3 years ago

    I liked this arc and don’t mind the rerun. I will be glad when according to new daily strips will start again in November. Haven’t seen the show Trudeau started yet, anyone else?

  8. rpmurray

    rpmurray said, about 3 years ago


    It was canceled. The network said it was too derivative and didn’t have any rerun potential in syndication.

  9. avtar123

    avtar123 said, about 3 years ago

    The Daily News says November 18th.

  10. Kaffekup

    Kaffekup said, about 3 years ago

    It hasn’t been cancelled; it’s not on a network.

  11. ncalifgirl58

    ncalifgirl58 said, about 3 years ago


    How rude. It must be Monday because it is easier to ignore someone’s post than to post this trash.

  12. DavyG

    DavyG said, about 3 years ago

    Yes, we did have a revolution, but for reasons I can’t fathom, some Americans can’t lose their fascination with the British royalty.

    About a generation ago, I heard a noise in my living room early one morning and went to investigate. Rather than the burglar I feared, it was my roommate’s girlfriend, glued to the television with Kleenex in hand, watching Charles and Di get married 6-7 time zones away. (The minister sounded like Alfred Hitchcock.) She was there because my roommate had a large (for its day) color TV, and she only had B&W at home. I muttered something along the lines of “Thought we got rid of those people back in the 1700s,” and went back to bed.

    I was surprised that she of all people, a doctoral student in biochemistry, would get caught up in that. Education level apparently has nothing to do with it.

  13. Kaffekup

    Kaffekup said, about 3 years ago

    Stick to the Tea Potty; it’s more relevant. I have no love for the royals, but nastiness is not becoming.

  14. ragarms

    ragarms said, about 3 years ago


    Astolat rude? Stop by more often. Please!

  15. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, about 3 years ago


    There’s a certain romanticism involved with the worship of royalty; some people believe it’s a hallmark of simpler (and therefore “better”) days when everybody knew their place and it was easy to tell who was better than who.
    So much easier than modern times, where you have to actually pay attention to people to figure out their worth!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).