Doonesbury by Garry Trudeau

Doonesbury

Comments (34) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ✯✯ Vista Bill Raley and Comet ✯✯

    ✯✯ Vista Bill Raley and Comet ✯✯ GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    So it’s all coming out now, is it?

  2. barticle35

    barticle35 GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Yeah, real subtle.

  3. Orion

    Orion said, over 5 years ago

    Almost as subtle as the MSM’s shilling for any Democrat, including the now-out-in-the-public phone conversations plotting to make up stories to damage non-Democrats at the polls.

    Almost as subtle as even MSM execs admitting that the MSM was totally in the tank for Obama.

    So…one station shills for Bush, the entire rest of the media shills for any Democrat. Seems fair and balanced to me, sure.

    Orion

  4. ronebofh

    ronebofh said, over 5 years ago

    Orion-13 makes less sense than the spammers.

  5. cdward

    cdward said, over 5 years ago

    Orion-13, you think the so-called MSM shills for Democrats only because they don’t fawn all over the GOPers. There’s a bit of a difference.

  6. Sandfan

    Sandfan GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    All TV news is a joke, but I have to wonder why all the hand wringing about Fox. Are the liberals so doctrinaire that they can’t abide a single opposing viewpoint?

  7. Avolunteer

    Avolunteer GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    wonder what a short tank woman looks like?

  8. John Henry

    John Henry said, over 5 years ago

    Orion-13 struck a raw nerve among the Dan Rather libs.

  9. Nemesys

    Nemesys said, over 5 years ago

    I guess that by being the only network at the time that didn’t schill AGAINST Bush, Fox became the de facto network that schilled FOR him.

    Perhaps in retrospect, Fox should have joined the pack by selling Obama themed merchandise in its sovenier gift shop (NBC/MSNBS sells 29 items, including Obama Action Figures and “Yes, We Did!” t-shirts), or manufactured false evidence against Bush as CBS did. Then again, perhaps not going there was the right thing, as it’s rating and financial statements appear to validate.

    Of course, Garry (“Palin Doll Plots Death of Sleeping Children”) Trudeau never schills for or against anyone. Nope, never.

  10. Andy

    Andy said, over 5 years ago

    JosephBidenJr99 said, about 1 hour ago

    “Orion-13 struck a raw nerve among the Dan Rather libs.”

    So I guess a years-old reference is all you got? It seems to me. if there was a provable “liberal bias,” it would be easy to keep your references current.

  11. joefish25

    joefish25 said, over 5 years ago

    I facelifted my bar and it looks great!

  12. Nemesys

    Nemesys said, over 5 years ago

    billdog, a schill is a fish, and congratulations! You’re the first sucker I’ve baited and caught today, and only 45 minutes in.

    I guess you had to say something, but when the discussion turns to comments about spelling instead of comments about substance, it’s like you’re running up the white flag.

  13. Charlie Sommers

    Charlie Sommers said, over 5 years ago

    @sanfan … There is a vast difference between an opposing viewpoint and a lie. Example; Fox news pundits said nothing to contradict the two people who stated there was no terrorist attacks on Bush’s watch. They conveniently forgot about 9/11.

  14. silver29512

    silver29512 said, over 5 years ago

    shill    [shil] Slang –noun

    1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc.
    2. a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.

    schill - no dictionary results

  15. rotts

    rotts said, over 5 years ago

    Doppelspammerflaggen!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (19).