Lisa Benson for June 13, 2012

  1. Qwerty01s
    cjr53  almost 12 years ago

    Oh no, not the cat too!

     •  Reply
  2. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    Is that a Malibu Barbie?

     •  Reply
  3. Hacking dog original
    J Short  almost 12 years ago

    I was going to say at least you got rid of the cat. My apologies to CJR. (I’ve owned several. They live FOREVER; almost.)

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    zoidknight  almost 12 years ago

    Because the largest chunk of loss of the value of 401k’s and property values happened after he took office.

     •  Reply
  5. Images  10
    nz4m60  almost 12 years ago

    WELL, THE FINAL AWAKING HAS FINALLY STARTED ARRIVING TO THE CONSERVATIVE CARTOONIST! GEE, I WONDER WHY OUR WEALTH HAS DISSAPEARED? KEEP BOWING DOWN THE THE TEA PARTY, REPUBLICANS, SPECIAL INTEREST, AND WALL STREET AND YOU MAY HAVE A SIMILAR REVELATION WHEN IT’S ALL GONE FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU IN THE MIDDLE CLASS.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    pdchapin  almost 12 years ago

    Most of that wealth were paper assets resulting from the unrealistic and unsustainable increase in house prices. Family wealth is returning to a more realistic valuation.

     •  Reply
  7. Missing large
    joe vignone  almost 12 years ago

    The value did not disappear, it went straight into the pockets of the 1%, who now own 40% of the wealth of our nation. It could not have been down without those regressive tax policies which both parties are guilty of voting for.

     •  Reply
  8. Missing large
    joe vignone  almost 12 years ago

    49% don’t pay taxes because they are making too little to survive on the left overs. You can’t get blood out of a stone. Maybe you can get the 1% to cough up a few more shekels instead of stashing their money in the Cayman’s. After all, it was this country that made them filthy rich, maybe they can help us out of our debt now that they have sucked us dry. I am sure those people working for minimum wage would be tickled to be making enough to pay taxes. Just raise their wages! You can’t have it both ways.

     •  Reply
  9. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  almost 12 years ago

    Interesting this DID happen to some of our “investments”, in 2008!!!!!

     •  Reply
  10. Temp save2ss0
    wlcary  almost 12 years ago

    Are you serious? I’ll bet you vote too.

     •  Reply
  11. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    “give Fannie May and Freddie Mac, a big hand”

    Yes, because:“In fact, the GSEs loansperformed far better than loans securitized by private investment banks, and GSE loans performed better than someloans originated by institutions that held loans in their own portfolios.”

    “Some long-time critics of government and the GSEs, like American Enterprise Institute fellow Peter J. Wallison,36claim that the roots of the crisis can be traced directly to risky lending by government sponsored entities Fannie Maeand Freddie Mac. Although Wallison’s claims have received widespread attention in the media and by policy makers,the majority report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, several studies by Federal Reserve economists, andthe work of independent scholars suggest that Wallison’s claims are not supported by data.”

    2007-2012 crisis

     •  Reply
  12. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    “The price of fuel is also a big part of where our wealth is going”That is true, but your finger-pointing is misdirected. The price of oil rose because of the Iraq war.You can easily see that by looking at a chart of historical oil prices.But if it’s not high enough for you, be sure to vote for republicans. Maybe they will start a war in Iran to increase the price (and the profits of the oil companies that are their contributors) even more.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    PlainBill  almost 12 years ago

    Thank Bush. It was his tax cuts for the rich that caused this mess.

     •  Reply
  14. Qwerty01s
    cjr53  almost 12 years ago

    Additionally, this cartoon is very misleading. The drop is 40% and this shows more like 80% falling off the cliff. I’m thinking that the loss is really due to the deregulation the shrubster and cheney crew effected in the system.

     •  Reply
  15. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    You have stated the republican line, and attempted to “poison the well” by implying bias; but that charge can also be leveled against the republican commitee members, such as Wallison (appointed by Republicans Boehner and McConnell) who had a previous record of being a critic of GSE’s. Hardly an objective investigator.

    “However, this [ Wallison’s] view has not been supported by subsequent detailed analyses of mortgage market data”

    Financial_Crisis_Inquiry_Commission

    Also, you haven’t said anything about the Federal Reserve studies. Were they biased? And as Paul Krugman points out, there was also a bubble in the commercial real estate market, which is unconnected to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

     •  Reply
  16. 1006
    sw10mm  almost 12 years ago

    And your hero has done nothing but accelerate the problem. Keep mixing the kool aid.

     •  Reply
  17. 200px edhappy
    Howard Walter Premium Member almost 12 years ago

    “Gas prices at $82 a barrel should be $2 a gallon”Show your math. (assuming you know any)

    So now, in addition to all the other facts you deny, you believe the war had no effect on oil prices? Unrest in the middle-east has no effect on oil prices?It’s amazing… you will go on believing nonsense, rather than confront your own errors. You will vote against your own interest, rather than discard your preconceptions.Those who are interested in the facts, (not you, Ima) check out these citations:History and analysis of oil pricesThe invasion of Iraq cost the world $6 trillion in higher energy prices

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Lisa Benson