Woman: Where'd she go? Man: She kept shrinking in stature to where you can just make out her hair above the crawl... Tom: She'll blame the camera person.
IMHO, Palin deserves criticism from all comers for that self-reverential video she put out that barely mentioned the victims but whined about people ganging up on her when all she’s ever done is conduct informed, substantive debates on policy issues. Yeah, right.
If you can’t see the difference between the money some spit of a town in Alaska needs to work and the money a superpower of 300 million people with two wars need, I wouldn’t like to have your IQ, Harley!
Well, I happen to like ol’ Sarah. Her voice, that’s another matter. But something about her must certainly scare the libs b/c “they” keep harping about her. If “they” would just let things alone, then perhaps Ms. Palin will dissolve into the background. Maybe not, but constantly finding fault w/ her keeps the “mystique” going.
“Stop calling her out with stupid, baseless lies like a bulls eye map. ”
I don’t think the map had ANYTHING to do with the shooting, but I’m sorry, you’re wrong. She herself called them bullseye on her Twitter feed. They back-tracked to call them “surveyor symbols” in the aftermath of the shooting, which, I can understand given the baseless accusations linking her to the shooting, but sorry, she called them bullseyes.
http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa/status/29677744457
There it is straight from the source. That’s a history of her own Twitter feed, that is her post. Now, again, I am NOT saying that it links her to any shooting, but your comment is wrong. She called them bullseyes. Sorry.
Sarah Palin is not stupid, and as much as I dislike her, I feel a little, little bit sorry for her. But I must admit, calling it “blood libel,” a term used to slaughter Jews, was pretty … foolish.
There’s something about that argument: “Sarah sure must scare the libs or they wouldn’t attack her so much.” Based on that argument, you can’t ever say anything against her because then you’re scared. But if you don’t say anything against her ranting, then you must agree with her. What a brilliant way of shutting down all discussion.
Harley, even you can be so ignorant as to think $1,000,000,000,000 is a ‘drop in the bucket’. And my friend, President Obama wouldn’t have been saddled with Iraq and Afghanistan if Bush/Cheney had kept the focus on Bin Laden and Al Queda, and hadn’t gone off on a tangent to defend his Daddy’s good name against Saddam. Additional bailouts and stimulus spending wouldn’t have been necessary if the economy hadn’t melted down during Bush’s tenure. According to you guys, the entire $14 trillion debt magically materialized when Obama was sworn in.
Iraq and Afghanistan will end up costing a minimum of $3-4 TRILLION. That should also just about cover Harley’s psychiatric treatment before he’s “cured”.
Nancy Pelosi similarly must scare Conservatives, based on the same logic that Palin scares Liberals. Then again, Pelosi was the most effective Speaker of the House.
I was truly offended by Glenn Beck releasing a statement that if Palin were harmed by violence, it would destroy “our republic.”
That’s taking their mutual admiration society to new levels of ridiculousness. The greatest harm that could come to the nation is that someone were to harm Sarah Palin? I don’t think so, and I certainly wish her no harm. Both Beck and Palin are self-delusional.
grapfhics over 13 years ago
Nice reference FP2, Tiring is the word.
WarBush over 13 years ago
No time to reload I see.
joefish25 over 13 years ago
She had stature? Where was I? Durn burn it, I missed that one
Motivemagus over 13 years ago
FP2 - Har! Call the Doctor!
Simon_Jester over 13 years ago
Oh give it up harley, even your fellow conservatives are calling Palin a ditz.
And btw, as mayor of Wasilla, AK she ran a town of 6500 souls into debt to the tune of $10 Million smackers. ( And that’s the lowball figure )
Yeah, that’s some REAL qualifications, Jack.
Nelly55 over 13 years ago
rush who?
believecommonsense over 13 years ago
IMHO, Palin deserves criticism from all comers for that self-reverential video she put out that barely mentioned the victims but whined about people ganging up on her when all she’s ever done is conduct informed, substantive debates on policy issues. Yeah, right.
CorosiveFrog Premium Member over 13 years ago
If you can’t see the difference between the money some spit of a town in Alaska needs to work and the money a superpower of 300 million people with two wars need, I wouldn’t like to have your IQ, Harley!
mnsmkd over 13 years ago
Well, I happen to like ol’ Sarah. Her voice, that’s another matter. But something about her must certainly scare the libs b/c “they” keep harping about her. If “they” would just let things alone, then perhaps Ms. Palin will dissolve into the background. Maybe not, but constantly finding fault w/ her keeps the “mystique” going.
Jaedabee Premium Member over 13 years ago
“Stop calling her out with stupid, baseless lies like a bulls eye map. ”
I don’t think the map had ANYTHING to do with the shooting, but I’m sorry, you’re wrong. She herself called them bullseye on her Twitter feed. They back-tracked to call them “surveyor symbols” in the aftermath of the shooting, which, I can understand given the baseless accusations linking her to the shooting, but sorry, she called them bullseyes. http://twitter.com/sarahpalinusa/status/29677744457There it is straight from the source. That’s a history of her own Twitter feed, that is her post. Now, again, I am NOT saying that it links her to any shooting, but your comment is wrong. She called them bullseyes. Sorry.
Sarah Palin is not stupid, and as much as I dislike her, I feel a little, little bit sorry for her. But I must admit, calling it “blood libel,” a term used to slaughter Jews, was pretty … foolish.
Carolo1 over 13 years ago
Can’t take the heat , stay out of the kitchen and stop looking at Russia
Dtroutma over 13 years ago
Unfortunately, Palin is Paris (Hilton) minus the intellectual capacity, so will remain “popular” with the media.
pirate227 over 13 years ago
Jade, she may not be stupid but, she is definitely ignorant.
cdward over 13 years ago
There’s something about that argument: “Sarah sure must scare the libs or they wouldn’t attack her so much.” Based on that argument, you can’t ever say anything against her because then you’re scared. But if you don’t say anything against her ranting, then you must agree with her. What a brilliant way of shutting down all discussion.
Justice22 over 13 years ago
Ms. Palin is a money making machine and that is all. Does she earn it? I don’t believe so.
tcolkett over 13 years ago
Harleyquinn: what’s it like on that planet you live on? Seriously, get some help dude (dudess?)
biemmezeta over 13 years ago
Congratulations. Yours is the 1,000,001 cartoon about Sarah Palin. Now that you broke the record you can move on.
Bluejayz over 13 years ago
Harley, even you can be so ignorant as to think $1,000,000,000,000 is a ‘drop in the bucket’. And my friend, President Obama wouldn’t have been saddled with Iraq and Afghanistan if Bush/Cheney had kept the focus on Bin Laden and Al Queda, and hadn’t gone off on a tangent to defend his Daddy’s good name against Saddam. Additional bailouts and stimulus spending wouldn’t have been necessary if the economy hadn’t melted down during Bush’s tenure. According to you guys, the entire $14 trillion debt magically materialized when Obama was sworn in.
Thomas R. Williams over 13 years ago
Whinin’ and Pulin’.
Poor, poor pitiful Sarah, so much more dreadfully wounded than any of the …wounded. Or dead.
Dtroutma over 13 years ago
Iraq and Afghanistan will end up costing a minimum of $3-4 TRILLION. That should also just about cover Harley’s psychiatric treatment before he’s “cured”.
Jaedabee Premium Member over 13 years ago
Nancy Pelosi similarly must scare Conservatives, based on the same logic that Palin scares Liberals. Then again, Pelosi was the most effective Speaker of the House.
believecommonsense over 13 years ago
I was truly offended by Glenn Beck releasing a statement that if Palin were harmed by violence, it would destroy “our republic.”
That’s taking their mutual admiration society to new levels of ridiculousness. The greatest harm that could come to the nation is that someone were to harm Sarah Palin? I don’t think so, and I certainly wish her no harm. Both Beck and Palin are self-delusional.