Mike Luckovich for May 01, 2018

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  about 6 years ago

    Jim Jones was saner.

     •  Reply
  2. Ddwiz avatar
    DD Wiz Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Phony, hypocritical “holier-than thou” CONservative evangelical “Christians” who always wag their fingers in everyone else’s noses have been exposed for the money-grubbing frauds they are — they have officially relinquished any credibility on claiming to be the party of “family values” or the “moral majority” (they are neither moral nor the majority).

    These CONservative religious hucksters have proven that it is only about the money, supporting candidates who will REDISTRIBUTE middle class working people’s wealth upward to the few richest elites like themselves who already have the most, while pursuing their daily televangelist scams and weekly Sunday collection cons to swindle gullible suckers out of their hard-earned money.

     •  Reply
  3. Triumph
    Daeder  about 6 years ago

    On the one hand, evangelicals are total hypocrites. On the other hand, it’s nice to know that they are finally willing to admit that the whole “eternal heaven / eternal hell” thing doesn’t matter because it doesn’t exist. I just wish they’d find some middle ground where something still mattered.

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    feverjr Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Trump is the Golden Calf incarnate…

     •  Reply
  5. Avatar2
    Walrus Gumbo Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Kool-Aid? More like Fool-Aid, and what happened to, “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service?”

     •  Reply
  6. Picture
    Ontman  about 6 years ago

    They’re just lapping it up like the crazies they are.

     •  Reply
  7. Mr haney
    NeedaChuckle Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Trump’s Evangelicals are closet NeoNazis to put it bluntly.

     •  Reply
  8. John adams1
    Motivemagus  about 6 years ago

    The evangelicals who support Trump appear to fall into several categories:

    1. Racists: the vast majority of WHITE evangelicals supported Trump; the vast majority of BLACK evangelicals did not.

    2. Followers of the “prosperity gospel,” an appalling perversion of Christianity that claims God wants everyone to be rich, and pushes the inverse: that rich people are favored by God. It should not have to be said that this is in total opposition to Christianity, as well as being an odd, modern throwback to the “divine right of kings.”

    3. Misogynistic conservative Christians — the Christian Taliban, as it were — who would never, ever vote for a woman for president. Many “fundamentalist” Christians do things like forbidding women to wear “revealing” clothing (that is, short-sleeves and less than long skirts) or go into “mixed bathing” (that’s swimming to normal people). This isn’t even uncommon in parts of the South where I grew up. Pence exemplifies that view, which punishes and blames women for men’s inability to control their sexuality, and therefore puts constraints on women.

    Ironically, many of these people are those who have insisted on “character” as a key element of a presidential candidate, but clearly true Christian character, or even basic decency, falls way behind the three criteria above.

     •  Reply
  9. Img 0132 fotor
    stick&rudder  about 6 years ago

    The opiate of the masses.

     •  Reply
  10. Desron14
    Masterskrain Premium Member about 6 years ago

    I used to be a Southern Baptist until I realized their entire line of B.S. was based on LIES, FABLES AND TALL TALES written over HUNDREDS of years by a bunch of Bronze Age Goat Herders!!!! I’m feeling MUCH BETTER NOW! Do I believe in a supreme being? Yes. It’s RELIGION that’s a crock of crap. ALL OF THEM!!

     •  Reply
  11. Coexist
    Bookworm  about 6 years ago

    “Do this in remembrance of me.”

     •  Reply
  12. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member about 6 years ago

    “If evangelicalism ever wants to play a more positive role in social and political life, perhaps it’s time its leaders acknowledge that its public image isn’t a ‘grotesque caricature’ but the thing itself.” —Hollis Phelps, Religion Dispatches, 2018 April 19

     •  Reply
  13. Avatar
    JohnHarry Premium Member about 6 years ago
    Evangelicalism is in the top three of destructive forces in America. I can’t remember the other two right off. It’ll come to me , wait …wait…
     •  Reply
  14. Picture
    Sadandconfused9  about 6 years ago

    What we have here is evil done in the name of Jesus… Who was a brown Middle Eastern philosopher who advocated caring for the poor, the infirm, the elderly, the orphans, the widows, the downtrodden, the outcasts……………etc. Christianity has become the new label for evil enabling of evildoers. Evangical seem to be the worst.

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Not the Smartest Man On the Planet -- Maybe Close Premium Member about 6 years ago

    The Evangelicals’ support of Trump boils down to three reasons: 1) He’s not gay. 2) He’s not a woman. 3) He’s not black.

     •  Reply
  16. Bbb
    NeoconMan  about 6 years ago

    Finished the Kool-Aid long ago and have moved on to the Hatorade.

     •  Reply
  17. Jock
    Godfreydaniel  about 6 years ago

    @MOTIVEMAGUS

    Clearly reasoned, as usual, coming from your fine mind. I would like to add that a few Roy Moore types see in Trump a kindred spirit………..

     •  Reply
  18. Ahl13 3x4
    Andylit Premium Member about 6 years ago

    Its called playing the long game. The evangelicals were promised conservative judges. So far, promise fulfilled.

    I have a few friends within that community. Apparently they knew going in that Trump is a horndog with a checkered past. They don’t really care, provided they can get conservatives on the SCOTUS.

    They figure, correctly, that a conservative SCOTUS will provide benefits far beyond the 4 or 8 years of a Trump administration.

     •  Reply
  19. Calvin   hobbes   playtime in snow avatar flipped
    Andrew Sleeth  about 6 years ago

    Even el Presidente Moron Idiot needs someone to love him unconditionally, right?

     •  Reply
  20. Bill
    Mr. Blawt  about 6 years ago

    Evangelicals have turned away from God to drink the Trump kool-aid. If you don’t agree, you can explain how what Trump did was okay and what Clinton did was not. You can explain how they attacked a man for the color of his skin and backed a man who started a preemptive war. They are nothing but a hypocritical wing of the Republican party, and worship money like the rest of them.

     •  Reply
  21. Missing large
    badeckman  about 6 years ago

    Republichristians those who ignore the biblical teachings of Jesus while religiously following republican doctrine in the name of Christ.

     •  Reply
  22. Little b
    Dani Rice  about 6 years ago

    All of this is nothing new. Savonarola wasn’t burned at the stake by the Evangelicals.

     •  Reply
  23. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 6 years ago

    Americans were idiots to elect vicious liar Trump the Crooked.

     •  Reply
  24. Agent gates
    Radish the wordsmith  about 6 years ago

    How many abortions is Trump responsible for?

     •  Reply
  25. Tf 117
    RAGs  about 6 years ago

    It is amazing how “evangelicals” can quote the bible verbatim (“chapter and verse”) in a language (usually English) that didn’t even start until some 500 years after Jesus died. English didn’t evolve into something which we would understand today for another 600 years.

    The “Old Testament” was originally an oral retelling in Aramaic and ancient Hebrew of stories that were later written down (in ancient Hebrew) and then translated into early Greek, and the Greek into Latin, which was later translated into other languages, including early English by people who didn’t always know the previous language that well. That is why there are so many English versions of “the Bible”. John Wycliffe, in the late 1300’s, decided to go back to the “original” (Hebrew and Aramaic) to translate them into Middle English. This was the start of “modern” English (and other) versions of the scriptures. Please remember that oral retellings rely on the ability of the reteller to accurately remember the story each time. Translations require the translator to precisely know both the originating and end languages, and for both languages to have the exact same vocabularies (an exceedingly rare thing, indeed).

    As a result, today’s English “Bible” is a very loose approximation of what the originators believed to have occurred or been said.

    Most current Bible scholars, use their preferred versions of the Bible as starting points, not as a strict accountings of what happed.

    Of course evangelicals use THEIR bibles as a base for attacks on those they don’t like.

     •  Reply
  26. Plsa button
    Richard S Russell Premium Member about 6 years ago

    For an insightful review of half a millennium of magical thinking in America, starting with the Puritans and running right up to the age of “fake news” and “alternative facts”, I highly recommend Kurt Andersen’s excellent book Fantasyland.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Mike Luckovich