Matt Davies for December 22, 2014

“better B thab C”It’s all a matter of opinion. I’d prefer neither of them.

Jeb has no chance. The legal shenanigans he pulled trying to subvert the courts in the Terry Schaivo case will ensure he has little support from the Democrats. And he’s not hard right conservative enough for the Republican party, unless Republicans suddenly come to their senses and realize that requiring ideological purity is going to cost them members and votes. It hasn’t happened up to now, but stranger things have happened.

Ms. Clinton has one thing going for her: name recognition. Also, she’s a woman, which will gain her some votes. But it will probably also cost her some votes, so probably net it’s a wash.

We can hope that neither ends up as a candidate.

I don’t want either of these two, but even Jim Webb, who I like basically, presents serious problems on environmental issues.

Whe JEBs daughter was picked up repeatedly for drug sales and abuse, but like LImbaugh, skated with community service and “treatement” instead of the long, or life, prison sentences JEB was demanding for all “lesser” drug criminals without hers, or Rush’s “connections”, the hypocrisy is enough to say he does NOT belong in the White House, unless it’s a retirement home on Kennibunkport with the rest of his family.

Both suck.

American Dynasty

Not a taller fence. Electrify it!

electrify that fence.

Robert Landers:

Bernie SanderElizabeth WarrenDennis KucinichAnd, to really spice things up, Noam Chomsky.Hey, MIKE GRAVEL would be a better choice than all these autocratic warmongering corporate lackeys.

(Cue the “but he/she can’t win” line).