Advertisement

Pat Oliphant for October 27, 2008

15 Comments

Hide All Comments
  1.  1149954847
    bell3rose1a  about 11 years ago

    It’s too good for him!

     •  Reply
  2. 009 8a
    MaryWorth Premium Member about 11 years ago

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…

     •  Reply
  3. Amnesia
    Simon_Jester  about 11 years ago

    Next up is Phil Graham, McCain’s economic guru.

     •  Reply
  4. John adams1
    Motivemagus  about 11 years ago

    Simon - it’s Phil Gramm. Strangely, both like and unlike the cracker!

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    dhleaky Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Oliphant is a genius.

     •  Reply
  6. Missing large
    Eugeno Premium Member about 11 years ago

    Unfortunately, more than one person is responsible for the problem - and, also unfortunately, none of them have any responsibility to ‘the people’ -the Federal Reserve is completely independent of the gov’t, with NO oversight of any kind.

     •  Reply
  7. Awww
    Alexus_The_Great  about 11 years ago

    poor Mr. Greenspan, who would ever think that radical capitalists will behave as radical capitalists with no regulation? what about the trickle down economics? what about the “natural” distribution of wealth when you give humongous tax cuts for the rich? what COULD have happened with those beautiful fairy tales?

     •  Reply
  8. Statue liberty 2
    GNWachs  about 11 years ago

    Of course the people who bought a $600,000 home with a gross income of $60,000 were just duped. And Clinton forcing the banks to make sub-prime loans was just bad luck. Far better to blame the other guys.

     •  Reply
  9. Missing large
    jimbo90036  about 11 years ago

    Why was Greenspan surprised!

     •  Reply
  10. Woodstock
    HUMPHRIES  about 11 years ago

    GNW, your line has been running on endless loop for weeks now. Do try another approach.

     •  Reply
  11. Awww
    Alexus_The_Great  about 11 years ago

    GNW: Let me ask you ONE question: Did the wanna-be home owners put a gun in the heads of the financial institutions forcing them to give huge credits to pay for over-priced houses????

     •  Reply
  12. Augustusbrunnen
    Suetonius  about 11 years ago

    GNWachs Let us try this one more time. Between 92 and 98% of those “unfit” subprime borrowers are making their payments on time with no foreclosure. That is 9 out of 10. THEY are NOT to blame for this crisis. It is the “clever” brokers who came up with the ridiculous idea of pooling and selling debt as a security. Want some background? Go ahead and read about the Great Panic of 1819. In a lot of ways, it seems to be the best parallel to the present situation. Substitute “financial institutions selling CDO’s” for “wildcat banks” and you pretty much have history repeating itself almost 200 years later.

     •  Reply
  13. Missing large
    davidlewis  about 11 years ago

    Subprime loans were a bad thing, but US housing would be just another market bubble that burst if it weren’t for “credit default swaps”, i.e. CDSs, which are actually insurance. They used the word “swaps to avoid insurance industry regulations, with Greenspan’s approval.

    Imagine normal insurance. You pay someone a premium, and they pay you if your house burns down. That’s how the “swaps” industry started. Then, because there were no regulations, it evolved so that ten of your neighbors could buy policies from ten different companies so that if your house burned down, ten companies have to pay the full value of your house to ten of your neighbors. Credit default insurance is insurance against someone not paying a loan back, among many other things.

    From around 2000 to 2008 $55 - $65 trillion dollars of policies were issued as financial instruments to banks and institutions all over the world. Its just like a load of side bets on a football game by now. This is the biggest casino that has ever existed. Now, when a house burns down, say Lehman Bros bankruptcy, it’s a big “credit event” which makes policies of far greater value than anything on Lehman’s books suddenly become liabilities on the books of banks all over the world. If one of those institutions goes bankrupt as a result, its another “credit event”, and on and on. This is an unprecedented situation. Lehman wasn’t too big to fail, the consequences of letting Lehman fail were too grave to let it fail. There’s a difference. They didn�t understand what would happen if they let Lehman go, they know now and its regarded as the mistake of the century. The CDS industry wanted no regulation so they would not have to keep capital on hand to back up the policies they sold because they allowed themselves to believe there was very little risk as there would never be an impossible situation like US house prices going down and a lot of mortgage backed securities suddenly becoming worthless, otherwise they never would have let the world’s financial institutions become interlocked in this way so that the entire system resembles a bunch of dominoes teetering on the brink. The mortgage backed securities just threaten serious damage, but the rest are so interlocked by CDSs that the entire world is threatened.

    People are considering, how could this have been allowed to happen? And the answer is coming up, again and again, from people who understand what happened, that the guy who prominently declared that this stack of dominoes, as it was being built, was lowering risk, was Alan Greenspan.

     •  Reply
  14. Obama757
    Celogen  about 11 years ago

    Will anyone ever pay for this?

     •  Reply
  15. Missing large
    Jeffritoman  almost 11 years ago

    “Will anyone ever pay for this?”

    We already are.

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment
Advertisement

More From Pat Oliphant

Advertisement