When Republicans are queried as to WHY the funding of Donnie’s totally superfluous wall wasn’t funded while Donnie John’s party was in total control of the Congress, the usual argument is advanced that it would be useless to introduce “funding” in the House because any bill so introduced would be defeated in the Senate because, poor them, they didn’t have 60 votes necessary to ram it past the Democrats in the Senate!
Really?
If THAT’S their argument, how then do they explain the over 50 bills the House sent to the Senate to destroy “Obamacare”. I’m not "discovering the logic in their argument! There was NEVER any hope that ANY of those illogical attempts had any hope of succeeding – yet they continually made the attempt!
Could it be that VERY FEW Congressional Republicans EVER supported Donnie John’s idiotic wall?
When Republicans are queried as to WHY the funding of Donnie’s totally superfluous wall wasn’t funded while Donnie John’s party was in total control of the Congress, the usual argument is advanced that it would be useless to introduce “funding” in the House because any bill so introduced would be defeated in the Senate because, poor them, they didn’t have 60 votes necessary to ram it past the Democrats in the Senate!
Really?
If THAT’S their argument, how then do they explain the over 50 bills the House sent to the Senate to destroy “Obamacare”. I’m not "discovering the logic in their argument! There was NEVER any hope that ANY of those illogical attempts had any hope of succeeding – yet they continually made the attempt!
Could it be that VERY FEW Congressional Republicans EVER supported Donnie John’s idiotic wall?