4 things: First, you just say that the links I posted are BS, you don’t refute them. Second, your claim that the Wikipedia entry doesn’t support me completely ignores the section at the end titled “Relation to 2008 financial crisis”, which is mostly highlights the arguments against the CRA being a cause. Third, you choose to attack the arguers rather than take issue with their arguments. But, fourth and most interestingly, in the video you link to, the people you purport to support your argument are suggesting MORE REGULATION.
But, to engage you with reason rather than rant, I offer you this: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/11/examining-the-big-lie-how-the-facts-of-the-economic-crisis-stack-up/. It examines “the banks were forced to lend to deadbeats” arguments and refutes them quite handily. If you disagree, please tell why so we can debate facts and conclusions rather than slinging mud at each other.
How does reposting the same link reinforce your argument? Especially after the last link I posted refutes what yours says? Do you have a specific point to make, or are you just posting something that says what you want it to say? I’d be happy to engage you, but you have to put more effort into forming a cogent viewpoint.
pirate227 over 12 years ago
Man of the people…
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
Sorry av, this myth only contiues through repetition. It’s been disproven over and over: http://howdidthishappen.org/myths/
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://howdidthishappen.org/myths/
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/14/opinion/rabbit-hole-economics.html
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://mediamatters.org/research/200809300012
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#Relation_to_2008_financial_crisis
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/opinion/nocera-the-big-lie.html
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://spfaust.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/what-caused-the-financial-crisis-housing-bubble-not-the-myth-about-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-2/
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
http://www.theparetocommons.com/2011/02/mythbusters-telling-the-truth-about-the-financial-crisis-ii/
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
….Now, anything to support your claim?
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
4 things: First, you just say that the links I posted are BS, you don’t refute them. Second, your claim that the Wikipedia entry doesn’t support me completely ignores the section at the end titled “Relation to 2008 financial crisis”, which is mostly highlights the arguments against the CRA being a cause. Third, you choose to attack the arguers rather than take issue with their arguments. But, fourth and most interestingly, in the video you link to, the people you purport to support your argument are suggesting MORE REGULATION.
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
But, to engage you with reason rather than rant, I offer you this: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/11/examining-the-big-lie-how-the-facts-of-the-economic-crisis-stack-up/. It examines “the banks were forced to lend to deadbeats” arguments and refutes them quite handily. If you disagree, please tell why so we can debate facts and conclusions rather than slinging mud at each other.
agate1 over 12 years ago
Ah Mitt, we will always have the Caymans. Here’s looking at you kid!
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
So rather than support your position, you’re going to hurl some snark and quit?
CasualBrowser over 12 years ago
How does reposting the same link reinforce your argument? Especially after the last link I posted refutes what yours says? Do you have a specific point to make, or are you just posting something that says what you want it to say? I’d be happy to engage you, but you have to put more effort into forming a cogent viewpoint.
ZydecoBear over 12 years ago
Mitt claims to be a blue collar guy, but that only true if he’s wearing the right color Saville Row shirt