Matt Wuerker for November 15, 2011

  1. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 12 years ago

    The SCUMUS court?

     •  Reply
  2. Granny
    MaeRiot  over 12 years ago

    Also known as the hypocrite card… “Do as I say – Not as I do”.

     •  Reply
  3. Infantry
    aguirra3  over 12 years ago

    Wait, this doesn’t look like Justice Elena Kagan who helped craft the Obamanational Health care plan…is this part of the hypocrite card as well?

     •  Reply
  4. Missing large
    eepatt  over 12 years ago

    @SrNON..: This cartoon is about what they do while on the court, not what they did before they were nominated. Why don’t you look before you hypocritize?

     •  Reply
  5. Dr horrible1.jpg
    grayhares01  over 12 years ago

    Funny how quickly the libtards turn when suddenly the SCOTUS isn’t legislating progressivism from the bench.

    .

    Suddenly when they are actually doing what’s best for the country, the liberals hate the SCOTUS…

     •  Reply
  6. Calvin hobbes
    Noveltman  over 12 years ago

    I don’t hate what isn’t corrupt. IF it was corrupt for the middle class I would hate it just as much. Corruption smells really bad.

     •  Reply
  7. Birthcontrol
    Dtroutma  over 12 years ago

    The Constitution says Justices serve “while on good behavior”, NOT for “life”. These two have repeatedly refused to recuse themselves on cases they had direct interest in, among other things, and both should have been impeached a long time ago. Merely attending a dinner to be “honored” by the corporate interests you just announced you would hear a case in their interests, is “interesting”.

     •  Reply
  8. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 12 years ago

    Bottom line: They are openly enjoying conflicts of interest — Thomas concealed his wife’s very active interest in issues he was ruling on — without the slightest hint of concern.

     •  Reply
  9. Jollyroger
    pirate227  over 12 years ago

    Hold on, did you forget that it’s alright when right-wing nuts do it? Silly.

     •  Reply
  10. Missing large
    Ronald Johnson  over 12 years ago
    Failing to mention or report that YOUR WIFE is drawing $500,000 from right-wing conservative corporate interests and calling it “an oversight in hind-sight” by Supreme Court Clarence Thomas is, indeed, “interesting” ! Isn’t it ? ? ? How is judicial mis-behavior of this sort tolerable when it is both intolerable and impeachable in Congressional and Presidential constitutional officers of the other branches of government ?
     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Matt Wuerker