@SrNON..: This cartoon is about what they do while on the court, not what they did before they were nominated. Why don’t you look before you hypocritize?
The Constitution says Justices serve “while on good behavior”, NOT for “life”. These two have repeatedly refused to recuse themselves on cases they had direct interest in, among other things, and both should have been impeached a long time ago. Merely attending a dinner to be “honored” by the corporate interests you just announced you would hear a case in their interests, is “interesting”.
Bottom line: They are openly enjoying conflicts of interest — Thomas concealed his wife’s very active interest in issues he was ruling on — without the slightest hint of concern.
Failing to mention or report that YOUR WIFE is drawing $500,000 from right-wing conservative corporate interests and calling it “an oversight in hind-sight” by Supreme Court Clarence Thomas is, indeed, “interesting” ! Isn’t it ? ? ? How is judicial mis-behavior of this sort tolerable when it is both intolerable and impeachable in Congressional and Presidential constitutional officers of the other branches of government ?
Dtroutma over 12 years ago
The SCUMUS court?
MaeRiot over 12 years ago
Also known as the hypocrite card… “Do as I say – Not as I do”.
aguirra3 over 12 years ago
Wait, this doesn’t look like Justice Elena Kagan who helped craft the Obamanational Health care plan…is this part of the hypocrite card as well?
eepatt over 12 years ago
@SrNON..: This cartoon is about what they do while on the court, not what they did before they were nominated. Why don’t you look before you hypocritize?
grayhares01 over 12 years ago
Funny how quickly the libtards turn when suddenly the SCOTUS isn’t legislating progressivism from the bench.
.
Suddenly when they are actually doing what’s best for the country, the liberals hate the SCOTUS…
Noveltman over 12 years ago
I don’t hate what isn’t corrupt. IF it was corrupt for the middle class I would hate it just as much. Corruption smells really bad.
Dtroutma over 12 years ago
The Constitution says Justices serve “while on good behavior”, NOT for “life”. These two have repeatedly refused to recuse themselves on cases they had direct interest in, among other things, and both should have been impeached a long time ago. Merely attending a dinner to be “honored” by the corporate interests you just announced you would hear a case in their interests, is “interesting”.
Motivemagus over 12 years ago
Bottom line: They are openly enjoying conflicts of interest — Thomas concealed his wife’s very active interest in issues he was ruling on — without the slightest hint of concern.
pirate227 over 12 years ago
Hold on, did you forget that it’s alright when right-wing nuts do it? Silly.
Ronald Johnson over 12 years ago