Scott Stantis for January 07, 2009

  1. 0967056667 01 mzzzzzzz
    TheGreatSatan  over 15 years ago

    Exactly. Don’t let his cult members know that though, they might get upset and somehow blame Bush.

     •  Reply
  2. Buddy
    lalas  over 15 years ago

    So if a large part of his package involves infrastructure developments how does that equate to desks? How does it even equate to gov’t jobs?

     •  Reply
  3. Buddy
    lalas  over 15 years ago

    The privatization of gov’t jobs has exploded in the last 8 years with NO ACCOUNTING for whether it has saved us money or cost us more money. I’ve never understood how a for profit company could save the gov’t money.

     •  Reply
  4. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 15 years ago

    lalas- it depends on how you count it. Instead of supporting benefits, etc., theoretically you can pay a smaller direct fee to someone with no short-term bennies and no long-term retirement benefit lump to be paid down the line. Unfortunately, it doesn’t usually look that way, and you actually pay a premium so the for-profits get their cut here and now. But you can proclaim that you’ve “reduced headcount” without saying you’re now paying 30% more for outsourcing. After all, it’s not like we can outsource the government security files to India, can we? The myth is that business is more efficient than government, but they also charge more, and they’re not necessarily more efficient in different contexts. And of course people like Blackwater (which got a slap on the wrist for its gun-totin,’ trigger-happy tough-guy wannabes) and Halliburton rode the gravy train for a while, which certainly benefits Cheney and friends of Bush – and sorry, TGS, I’m blaming Cheney for some of that. Does that count?

     •  Reply
  5. Missing large
    raycity  over 15 years ago

    Goverment does not use shovels hire 10,000 Gov workers with teaspoons and pay union wage

     •  Reply
  6. Woodstock
    HUMPHRIES  over 15 years ago

    fennec, why? They’ve done that very seldom, think they might start now?

     •  Reply
  7. 1107121618000
    CorosiveFrog Premium Member over 15 years ago

    Ok, so if the government pays desk people they are lazy but if the private sector pays the same people they can’t be? Explain the logic behind that, please!

     •  Reply
  8. 0967056667 01 mzzzzzzz
    TheGreatSatan  over 15 years ago

    “but if the private sector pays the same people they can’t be? Explain the logic behind that, please!”

    They’d get fired.

     •  Reply
  9. 1107121618000
    CorosiveFrog Premium Member over 15 years ago

    they’d get fired in the public sector as well.

     •  Reply
  10. 0967056667 01 mzzzzzzz
    TheGreatSatan  over 15 years ago

    “they’d get fired in the public sector as well.”

    Apparently you’ve never been to a DMV or a public school.

     •  Reply
  11. 1107121618000
    CorosiveFrog Premium Member over 15 years ago

    Up here (we have a bigger government than you) there’s a line at government offices but go at the local Dollar Store or Canadian Tire (Canada’s Home Depot, sort of) and there’s a line too.

    What I like here is that you can apply for a lot of things online; apply for a student loan, apply for a hunting license, pay the water bill…

    Services Nouveau-Brunswick is a leader in that kind of stuff and it does it in two languages (a difficulty you guys don’t have). I’m not sure if they do the same in other provinces though…

    Point is, government stuff doesn’t have to be a nightmare! The good use of new technologies is a good place to start.

     •  Reply
  12. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 15 years ago

    Actually, the DMVs in Massachusetts (or at least in Boston) are quite efficient, considering how many people they have to move through.

     •  Reply
  13. 0967056667 01 mzzzzzzz
    TheGreatSatan  over 15 years ago

    You two can go ahead an lie to yourselves about the government being better than the average citizen all you want it won’t make it true.

    It’s odd that liberals vocally denounce corrupt government practices but VOTE for them time and time again.

     •  Reply
  14. John adams1
    Motivemagus  over 15 years ago

    TGS - obviously not, since I voted against Bush-Cheney twice…

     •  Reply
Sign in to comment

More From Scott Stantis