Cheer up, kid. At least it’s not the Kim Petras cover.
It sure made a bunch of older women happy.
Hm. Because an old woman is not supposed to be attractive, I suppose. Really really not sure how I feel about this.
If he looks at the pictures and does not read the article, no harm, no foul.
Martha Stewart is beautiful, and so is Kim Petras. I don’t know why conservatives are having a problem with that.
Martha Stewart is over 80 and looks great.
It was refreshing to see a woman not showing all her ass-ets!
HA!
Selecting Martha Stewart was bold and inclusive.
[#scratches head#] whut?
I wonder whose corpse donated the lips?
Tradewinds309 about 1 year ago
Cheer up, kid. At least it’s not the Kim Petras cover.
ibFrank about 1 year ago
It sure made a bunch of older women happy.
calliarcale about 1 year ago
Hm. Because an old woman is not supposed to be attractive, I suppose. Really really not sure how I feel about this.
aristoclesplato9 about 1 year ago
If he looks at the pictures and does not read the article, no harm, no foul.
Stephen Runnels Premium Member about 1 year ago
Martha Stewart is beautiful, and so is Kim Petras. I don’t know why conservatives are having a problem with that.
Scoutmaster77 about 1 year ago
Martha Stewart is over 80 and looks great.
Zebrastripes about 1 year ago
It was refreshing to see a woman not showing all her ass-ets!
tpcox928 about 1 year ago
HA!
Rich Douglas about 1 year ago
Selecting Martha Stewart was bold and inclusive.
Màiri about 1 year ago
[#scratches head#] whut?
JohnHarry Premium Member about 1 year ago
I wonder whose corpse donated the lips?